Hi,

Thanks for the info.

So the shell and registration number go together

Paula

360beast wrote:I know Madseb did

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=15802&p=183456&hil ... le#p183456

But if I'm right then he stripped it down and sold the shell

Trundle 2 - G784 CPK still lives ...

Useful link this: https://mot-history.net/

Registration number: G784CPK

Mileage readings are currently only available for MOTs done from 1 August 2011.

Vehicle makeVOLVO Vehicle model340 Date first used1 December 1989 Fuel typePetrol ColourRed

MOT history of this vehicle

Test date 9 May 2015 Expiry date 8 May 2016 Test Result Pass Odometer reading123,464 miles MOT test number5654 9982 5180

Test date 15 March 2014 Expiry date14 March 2015 Test Result Pass Odometer reading121,505 miles MOT test number6298 6427 4059

Test date 8 May 2009 Expiry date7 May 2010 Test Result Pass MOT test number6344 2832 9184 Advisory notice item(s)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
slight run-out on n/s rear brake
slight run-out on front brakes
front cross member holed and corroded
slight bind n/s rear brake
slight play in steering rack

Test date 16 May 2007 Expiry date15 May 2008 Test Result Pass MOT test number2415 7613 7442

Test date 10 May 2007 Test Result Fail MOT test number4611 2003 7174 Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
Nearside Front passenger door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.B.1b)
Nearside Front Brake hose bulging under pressure (3.6.B.3)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)

Good news! All that MOT information is available online? I'm amazed ... data protection and all that.

Cheers

Tom

It's the new improved MOT History service from Gov.uk (old cert or V5C ref number no longer required)

https://mot-history.net

trabitom99 wrote:I'm amazed ... data protection and all that.

Yeah, but the general public need to know that the stars are maintaining their cars

And you get gold like this over on AutoShite:

http://autoshite.com/topic/22084-new-mo ... /?p=845098

That is incredible. Big brother is watching ... let's check all our neighbours' cars and wag our fingers at them.

Either a car is safe (MOT), or it's not (no MOT) - but plastering that info all over the web ... not my cup of tea. Maybe they should just have made the MOT test stricter (no advisories anymore, just get it fixed und retested within 4 weeks).

Just my opinion ...

Tom

I am interested in data protection, but I don't see a problem with publishing data on products/items. Data protection is about your personal data not random products. You can already get mot/tax data on most vehicles, more details are irrelevant to its 'acceptableness' in law.

Gov'ts are tending to use crowd sourcing more to police/report issues, and why not? Australia now has a product safety/EMC registration system where any opne can check a particular product has been registered and someone is taking responsibility for its electrical compliance.

However I do take issue with the police 100% relying on a database that can be prone to error, and using it to sieze your car. After watching these police programs, they can be 'sure' you have no insurance after speaking to an insurance company, only to discover later that the insurance company was wrong. There maybe a problem with uninsured drivers but making everyone prove their innocence is not really for an advanced society.

Anyway my 360 has no records and my 940 seems to have expired in 2007 (probably after it was imported to N.Ireland).

I think it's a useful consumer tool to check validity of the paper receipt since they went cheap abd stopped issuing proper certs.

Wouldn't put too much emphasis on advisories as some testers write some right old garbage.


I'm more concerned of the DVLA flogging data to parking cowboys...

Hi all,

I see that Trundle 2's MOT expired May 8th 2016. Has the guy in Kent still got it?

Ta

Paula

Paula wrote:Trundle 2 - G784 CPK still lives ...

Useful link this: https://mot-history.net/

Registration number: G784CPK

Mileage readings are currently only available for MOTs done from 1 August 2011.

Vehicle makeVOLVO Vehicle model340 Date first used1 December 1989 Fuel typePetrol ColourRed

MOT history of this vehicle

Test date 9 May 2015 Expiry date 8 May 2016 Test Result Pass Odometer reading123,464 miles MOT test number5654 9982 5180

Test date 15 March 2014 Expiry date14 March 2015 Test Result Pass Odometer reading121,505 miles MOT test number6298 6427 4059

Test date 8 May 2009 Expiry date7 May 2010 Test Result Pass MOT test number6344 2832 9184 Advisory notice item(s)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
slight run-out on n/s rear brake
slight run-out on front brakes
front cross member holed and corroded
slight bind n/s rear brake
slight play in steering rack

Test date 16 May 2007 Expiry date15 May 2008 Test Result Pass MOT test number2415 7613 7442

Test date 10 May 2007 Test Result Fail MOT test number4611 2003 7174 Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
Nearside Front passenger door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.B.1b)
Nearside Front Brake hose bulging under pressure (3.6.B.3)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)

Still around.... needs a bit of work but still looks good, buy it back

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=16421