Page 1 of 1

Steering rack

Posted: 02 Nov 2006 04:06 pm
by filthyjohn
Is there any unforseen, silly reason why a non-PAS rack won't bolt straight in place of my PAS one? Mine whines and creaks, and it's had a couple of hard knocks, so I thought I'd replace it, after which it'd be free with all ancillaries to anyone who wants it.
I've decided I want manual steering because I assume it's less work to put in, and since I'm not a wussy single mother, I have no need for its puny power assistance :P
Plus it'll save about 0.75Bhp :lol:
Cheers for any help.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006 04:29 pm
by pettaw
No reason, you'll need the lower half of the steering column too though. The exhaust downpipe for a PAS is different, but will work fine with a non-PAS car.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006 04:31 pm
by filthyjohn
Cheers, that's what I thought. That was another reason, more space for exhaust routing if a turbo was to politely approach my car, introduce itself and buy it a drink.

Posted: 02 Nov 2006 10:58 pm
by classicswede
If anyone is interested there is a recon power rack of ebay

Posted: 14 Dec 2006 01:53 am
by jimf671
And the power rack has a different ratio. If you have the right tyres (and have increased overall offset, and maybe reduced castor) the power rack, without the power, is a way of getting quicker steering with plenty of feel.

Posted: 15 Dec 2006 09:33 pm
by foggyjames
The man makes a good point...and loves to bump old threads! There's quite a big difference in overall handling feel thanks to the 'quicker' rack.

cheers

James

Posted: 15 Dec 2006 11:23 pm
by A M R
hmmm might have to have this off you when i get my glt...

or is it possible to buy this anywhere else?

Posted: 16 Dec 2006 12:50 am
by pettaw
not so sure that a PAS rack without pressure in it would perform the same as a non-PAS rack, just because all the valving etc is still there, and IMO would make it feel weird.

Agreed on the gearing though, PAS has almost a turn less lock to lock with the same steering movement.

Caster is the same on PAS and non-PAS cars, cos the PAS system was really an afterthought, rather than designed into the entire suspension system.

Posted: 16 Dec 2006 02:06 am
by foggyjames
The yanks who remove PAS from 240s the lazy way loop a hose between the two point which usually have hoses connected which 'leave the area' (to the reservoir and from the pump, respectively). It supposedly works... :?

cheers

James

Posted: 18 Dec 2006 01:58 pm
by antiekeradio
yep, all you do in that case is transfer the fluid from one side of the piston to the other. same effect as a hole in the piston.

Posted: 23 Dec 2006 09:20 pm
by jimf671
The bypass hose is the usual way of dealing with this. I havent actual seen one on a 360 but most seem to work ok this way. As long as there is something in there to lubricate it and no hydraulic lock it should work.