MCHUDD wrote:Hi mate.
Welcome to the 300 world. The 1.4 is easy to run and does not need power steering as it is rack n pinion.
The tax will be the same as your mini. As a second car you can insure it as a classic.
There is plenty of room to fiddle about in the engine bay also.
As for being 30,lucky B******d.
Cheers Mark.

Hi Mark thanks for the reply. Oh I didn't know you could class it as a classic!? Does it have to be a certain age? And yeah dude! I'm 30, when I was younger I thought that 30 was mid-life! How wrong was I!
volvosneverdie wrote:Nice Mini dude.
Yeah, 300s are easy to work on, and the 1.4 is unkillable. I tried by dropping a washer into the carb then taking it for a test drive. I got off with just a broken spark plug.
Rust is your enemy really. So have a good look at the sills, rear arches, jacking points, front vallance (though not an mot fail) before you pass money.
Theyre pretty thirsty for the power you get TBH. Downtuned from factory for reliability over performace, so the story goes.
Theyre a lot of fun, cheap and reliable though. And you cant get anything RWD cheaper.
Welcome to the forum.
Sup VND!
Hahaha you intentionally dropped a washer in there!?!?! Just wondering if the 1.4's come as carbed or injection? Or does that depend on the year of manufacture? Oh and what are the manufacturing dates from.... is there a particular model to avoid or one to have a super keen look at? I've seen a 2.0 one in the sales section which looks wicked, but I'm guessing it's a thirty mother!
Ah so rust is a problem... same as the Mini!
How thirsty is thirsty? I think I've managed to work out the Mini does around 32-33 mpg. I'd be using it everyday for a 30-40 minute journey, stopping and starting at lights and stuff!
Oh I've seen the fun you can have... I originally wanted to drift one but wasn't sure how enthusiasts view that.
Thanks for the warm welcome!
Ride_on wrote:The 1.4 340s are fairly easy to run and can be economical but I had varying results from <30mpg for a 1980 model to 45mpg for an 1985 model. The 1.4 doesn't last for high miles though (>150k would be rare), there are more about and still the odd 'nearly brand new' one popping up. The 1.4 engine is the same type as the mini ..OHV tappet followers, cam chain etc, but not crossflow. The 1.7s are more refined but I've had bad reliability with them.
If you are looking for a backup car then the 360 is more robust and luxurious than a 340 using the 2l engine from the 240, but much less economical. Mileage is not an issue for the engine, but they should be serviced properly of course. Check for oil and cam belt service.
Unlike the bigger Volvo's the 300 series is not hot dip galvanised so rust can be an issue, although its probably better rust proofed than the Mini. Check sills and jacking points.
A fine 300 could be got for £500, but you will have search hard to get a decent one.
Hi Ride_on
Thanks for the info, good to hear that I can still tinker with it!
So I'm guessing that difference between the 340 and the 360 is the engine size and creature comforts? I'd be using it as a daily driver so economy would be one of the things I'd be looking out for...
Ah sills and jacking points, and yeah Mini's are super prone to rust, it's one of the reasons I'm looking at getting a Volvo! Are parts cheap for the 340/60?
Ok so £500ish that's good to hear!
Thanks for the info! Nice friendly site! I LIKE!