MPG misery
Re: MPG misery
You'll get 50 mpg on the back of an AA truck but no other way I'm afraid.
Keeper of The Knights' of Bushido-lest we forget
Write it in your heart.
Stand by the code and it will stand by you.
Ask no more and give no less than honesty,courage,loyalty,generosity and fairness.
The code of the West.
Write it in your heart.
Stand by the code and it will stand by you.
Ask no more and give no less than honesty,courage,loyalty,generosity and fairness.
The code of the West.
Re: MPG misery
I'm sure i'll be in that situation at some point but i'll not be glad of the 50mpg then lol
'88 360 +T LSD - sold
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
Re: MPG misery
You might get 45 out of a kangoo engine but you'd need the 340 drivetrain for that
Re: MPG misery
^ Has anyone ever swapped the torque tube out for a chocolate prop before? lol
Fit a larger capacity turbo motor. It's improved my MPG and that's no BS. lol
Plus it can be done easier and for less cost than a boring albeit more fuel efficient diesel swap etc etc.
Fit a larger capacity turbo motor. It's improved my MPG and that's no BS. lol
Plus it can be done easier and for less cost than a boring albeit more fuel efficient diesel swap etc etc.
STREETO WITHDRAWL
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
Re: MPG misery
I already mentioned about fitting a 940 higher tech engine, I think that is the reason for your improved MPG. The 360 injection system is very basic.
If you really want good MPG you need to turn it into a series hybrid so that the electric motor is only driving the wheels, should get >100mpg then.
If you really want good MPG you need to turn it into a series hybrid so that the electric motor is only driving the wheels, should get >100mpg then.
1980 345 DL_______1987 360 GLE (project car restored to GLT spec and B230FT'd)
1984 360 GLT______1987 360 GLT
1983 360 GLS______1989 360 GLE
1985 340 GL_______1986 340 1.4
1985 360 GLS______1995 940 SE 2.3 Turbo Estate (daily)
1987 340 GL 1.7
1984 360 GLT______1987 360 GLT
1983 360 GLS______1989 360 GLE
1985 340 GL_______1986 340 1.4
1985 360 GLS______1995 940 SE 2.3 Turbo Estate (daily)
1987 340 GL 1.7
Re: MPG misery
My reason for improvement is I had a Stromberg. lol
Didn't realise a bigger/better replacement had been sugegsted. My apologies.
Didn't realise a bigger/better replacement had been sugegsted. My apologies.

STREETO WITHDRAWL
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon
Re: MPG misery
Or pull it by Horse.Ride_on wrote: If you really want good MPG you need to turn it into a series hybrid so that the electric motor is only driving the wheels, should get >100mpg then.
1 hp.
150 m.p.bag of hay.
Re: MPG misery
Hybrids are useless over 50mph! A prius does about 30mpg on the motorway 

Re: MPG misery
Not really fancying an engine swap as i don't have room, suitable working space etc. etc.
LPG did interest me but I'm just focussing on getting the engine running properly at the moment as there MUST be something wrong.
Nearly on the warning light and i've done 160 miles since i filled up to the click at the pumps. I'll fill it tonight and work out the MPG properly.
LPG did interest me but I'm just focussing on getting the engine running properly at the moment as there MUST be something wrong.
Nearly on the warning light and i've done 160 miles since i filled up to the click at the pumps. I'll fill it tonight and work out the MPG properly.
'88 360 +T LSD - sold
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
Re: MPG misery
Don't take it the wrong way mate, but young, newer drivers can never get the same MPG as an older driver also in 'sensible mode' I don't know what it is, but the only people you will find to dispute this are the young uns themselves!
I think many on here would agree with that.
No doubt there is something off with your engine, but don't expect to get anything over 25MPG IMO.
I think many on here would agree with that.
No doubt there is something off with your engine, but don't expect to get anything over 25MPG IMO.
STREETO WITHDRAWL
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
INTO BURNOUTSsince1982
Re: MPG misery
It is experience. Being more on road one learns to look more forward and plan more ahead, there comes petrol savings when one don't need to use brakes for much else than holding car on hill.
Basic rule is that every time you touch brake pedal, you waste petrol, to get really good mpg you need to think ahead like in playing chess, adjust speed so that braking is not needed and of course that leads to avoiding excess acceleration.
Most economic driving can be done with car that has no brakes at all, driver is forced to economic driving as stopping would be rather difficult and every stop lowers mpg greatly.
On highway again experience brings ability to use hills as petrol saving devices, gain speed at end of downhill when there is coming hill, let speed decrease on uphill and gain again it back on downhill, on average compared to keeping steady speed petrol saving is quite a bit, but impossible to do properly on traffic as it will drive other drivers insane.
So my french crap has 43.5MPG(UK) figure printed to user's manual when doing steady 90kph, my average consumption is 57.7MPG(UK), while my best on highway has been 64MPG(UK), over million miles of experience on road and trying my best to use as less diesel as possible.
Petrol car is more sensitive to rise in consumption than diesel, imo.
One very important thing, 50mph vs 55mph in my french crap means almost 1l/100km less consumption (almost most of my saving), it is not because air resistance or anything like that, but it is how I drive, doing 55mph it seems that I keep speed more steady and can't drive as well, braking more, also more overtaking etc. Doing 60 or even 70 will skyrocket consumption in any car.
Best would be ofcourse to drive with the flow of traffic, like single fish does in swarm of fishes.
That is at least what I think, surely I can be wrong on some things, but those things work for me, I could easily use just handbrake when driving, it is possible when we have these quite empty roads, but I don't know how things would work in UK where roads are quite crowded when compared to our roads.
Basic rule is that every time you touch brake pedal, you waste petrol, to get really good mpg you need to think ahead like in playing chess, adjust speed so that braking is not needed and of course that leads to avoiding excess acceleration.
Most economic driving can be done with car that has no brakes at all, driver is forced to economic driving as stopping would be rather difficult and every stop lowers mpg greatly.
On highway again experience brings ability to use hills as petrol saving devices, gain speed at end of downhill when there is coming hill, let speed decrease on uphill and gain again it back on downhill, on average compared to keeping steady speed petrol saving is quite a bit, but impossible to do properly on traffic as it will drive other drivers insane.
So my french crap has 43.5MPG(UK) figure printed to user's manual when doing steady 90kph, my average consumption is 57.7MPG(UK), while my best on highway has been 64MPG(UK), over million miles of experience on road and trying my best to use as less diesel as possible.
Petrol car is more sensitive to rise in consumption than diesel, imo.
One very important thing, 50mph vs 55mph in my french crap means almost 1l/100km less consumption (almost most of my saving), it is not because air resistance or anything like that, but it is how I drive, doing 55mph it seems that I keep speed more steady and can't drive as well, braking more, also more overtaking etc. Doing 60 or even 70 will skyrocket consumption in any car.
Best would be ofcourse to drive with the flow of traffic, like single fish does in swarm of fishes.
That is at least what I think, surely I can be wrong on some things, but those things work for me, I could easily use just handbrake when driving, it is possible when we have these quite empty roads, but I don't know how things would work in UK where roads are quite crowded when compared to our roads.
Re: MPG misery
right I'm averaging 22 mpg now since cleaning the air intake out and setting the idle properly (and probably driving much more conservatively) 200 miles on £40. My mate still reckons its misfiring on 1 or 2 cylinders and that i should change the leads whch i will tomorrow. Still going to get rid of the fan and put my electric one on. Aiming for 25 MPG normal driving with the occasional 'fun'. Also going to gap plugs properly, and get some injector cleaner ran through.
Cheers for all the help!
Cheers for all the help!
'88 360 +T LSD - sold
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
'87 760 TDI (D24TIC) - sold
'04 V40 D sport (F9Q, decat, Remapped, launch control)
'89 740 SE (b230ft, 12psi, V-cam, headwork, 'remapped', banded steels)
'86 340 DL 1.4
Re: MPG misery
Do you have the worlds cheapest petrol?! I make 200 miles on £40 about 27MPG @118.9 as it is here, which is pretty GLTish
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 09 Feb 2008 02:29 am
Re: MPG misery
That's a good point Chris. I'm thinking units here. You haven't been using US gallons at all? 1 Imperial gallon is 4.55 litres, so
miles / litres x 4.55 = mpg
miles / litres x 4.55 = mpg
Re: MPG misery
How about some litres per 100 miles figures? I have not seen such measure used, so let me be first at something
My best efforts would be like 7.2 l / 100 miles which does sound awful lot, even it is not
That would be 14.4 l / 100 miles for my 360 which was leaking petrol, 9 l / 100 km and ~31.6 MPG(UK) if I did not mistaken my numbers and dots.
Proper fuel management would probably save itself back quite fast, better install while you still can without MOT crap, what is done before regulations should be allowed, that is how it is here and probably will be there too, so now is your last chances to make crazy motor swaps and ecu upgrades etc.
Ready to install Megasquirt kits are not too expensive and rather easy to install into original wiring of GLT, that is what I would do at least, some have claimed better than 40MPG after that, how much is that 10+MPG in money? When done properly restoring original ECU for MOT etc is going to be single unplug MS and plugin original, might not be too expensive to buy installation either when considering savings in long run and also potential for angry cams, turbo, other motor etc.
What can you do, I just really like jumping needles and graphs on my laptop screen, when I drive around, too bad laws which you are about to get are already here and I would need catalytic converter installed or over 1000 euros emissions test, proof of engine power, proof that GLT has same brake parts, engine mounts etc as GL etc. etc. etc. No I'm not envy to you, a LOT
1987 is year limit here, where after lot of crap comes in, 1992 or 1993 onwards even more and when there is low emissions labeled in registration form then putting K&N alone is in theory violation and void of MOT. Sorry from OT, just thought that you would like(hate) to know...

My best efforts would be like 7.2 l / 100 miles which does sound awful lot, even it is not

That would be 14.4 l / 100 miles for my 360 which was leaking petrol, 9 l / 100 km and ~31.6 MPG(UK) if I did not mistaken my numbers and dots.
Proper fuel management would probably save itself back quite fast, better install while you still can without MOT crap, what is done before regulations should be allowed, that is how it is here and probably will be there too, so now is your last chances to make crazy motor swaps and ecu upgrades etc.
Ready to install Megasquirt kits are not too expensive and rather easy to install into original wiring of GLT, that is what I would do at least, some have claimed better than 40MPG after that, how much is that 10+MPG in money? When done properly restoring original ECU for MOT etc is going to be single unplug MS and plugin original, might not be too expensive to buy installation either when considering savings in long run and also potential for angry cams, turbo, other motor etc.
What can you do, I just really like jumping needles and graphs on my laptop screen, when I drive around, too bad laws which you are about to get are already here and I would need catalytic converter installed or over 1000 euros emissions test, proof of engine power, proof that GLT has same brake parts, engine mounts etc as GL etc. etc. etc. No I'm not envy to you, a LOT

1987 is year limit here, where after lot of crap comes in, 1992 or 1993 onwards even more and when there is low emissions labeled in registration form then putting K&N alone is in theory violation and void of MOT. Sorry from OT, just thought that you would like(hate) to know...