A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
-
foggyjames
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9361
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
Post
by foggyjames » 22 Oct 2011 08:52 pm
V6 Man wrote:No-one knew whether it was fuel or ign
I was pretty damn sure it wasn't fuel! I'll admit I suspected it was the hall sensor, but I don't remember you piping up to say "oh no, it's definitely the coil. I know because I just have to waggle my massive mechanic cock around and the answer just falls out of the end..."
Are you planning to do anything about the paint? After the boost, of course...
cheers
James
-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 22 Oct 2011 10:09 pm
Yeah, I was thinking about painting it the same or a slightly different blue, in matt. With the suspension low and some white wellas I'm picking up next weekend, I think it'll look pretty mean

-
Ride_on
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: 26 May 2009 05:34 pm
- Location: Belfast, N. Ireland
Post
by Ride_on » 24 Oct 2011 01:02 pm
Thats pretty much the same as a 940, always thought he differnce was headlights and tail gate, but looks identical to my 940.
I have a spare 940 estate if you need parts (except the engine).
You should have a nice solid clutch not the dual mass mess my 940 has.
I would treat extra boost with respect. I have some odd opinions on Turbo's that I cannot ratify with physics. People keep talking baout putting bigger turbos on, but this should not make any difference without other upgrades and only then if you can see the pressure dropping at full boost. Tuners then say 'ah it gives more flow', to which I will say 'well the pressure will then drop if it can't keep up, the flow depends on the pressure in the manifold'. The closest I can get is that the exhaust side is a bit restrictive on the manifold and turbo, and may respond to some gas flowing, there are some web resources for this. I do notice power flatting out when mine is on 11psi. When you rake it (at normal boost) the manifold seems to get the hottest.
Anyway what ever you do, use it sparingly. Eg sitting at 140 on the motorway caused parts to get too hot and crack-up on mine. I think the water cooled bearing makes the turbo a bit weak.
1980 345 DL_______1987 360 GLE (project car restored to GLT spec and B230FT'd)
1984 360 GLT______1987 360 GLT
1983 360 GLS______1989 360 GLE
1985 340 GL_______1986 340 1.4
1985 360 GLS______1995 940 SE 2.3 Turbo Estate (daily)
1987 340 GL 1.7
-
Chris_C
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9600
- Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
- Location: South Coast, UK
Post
by Chris_C » 24 Oct 2011 02:09 pm
Ride_on wrote:I would treat extra boost with respect. I have some odd opinions on Turbo's that I cannot ratify with physics. People keep talking baout putting bigger turbos on, but this should not make any difference without other upgrades and only then if you can see the pressure dropping at full boost. Tuners then say 'ah it gives more flow', to which I will say 'well the pressure will then drop if it can't keep up, the flow depends on the pressure in the manifold'. The closest I can get is that the exhaust side is a bit restrictive on the manifold and turbo, and may respond to some gas flowing, there are some web resources for this. I do notice power flatting out when mine is on 11psi. When you rake it (at normal boost) the manifold seems to get the hottest.
I've very little clue when it comes to turbo's, but my take was "more boost == more turbo spinning therefore more heat from the friction" getting you to law of diminishing returns. Bigger turbo means slower spinning and that law is pushed about xxbhp down the line?
This car is making me upsettingly want a big brick.
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 24 Oct 2011 06:20 pm
Chris_C wrote:
I've very little clue when it comes to turbo's, but my take was "more boost == more turbo spinning therefore more heat from the friction" getting you to law of diminishing returns. Bigger turbo means slower spinning and that law is pushed about xxbhp down the line?
This car is making me upsettingly want a big brick.
I know

This is the problem I had a few months ago, which led to this purchase.
As far as I know, smaller turbos can be better in some applications, giving more power down low as the lag is less, at least that's how I understand it. Big turbos give big power at the top end but then the lag is also much much bigger.
I'm still learning.
-
Chris_C
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9600
- Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
- Location: South Coast, UK
Post
by Chris_C » 24 Oct 2011 10:53 pm
Having just been looking at big bricks, why the hell do people buy 300's anymore? (ok, because they actually go round corners... but bear with me)
940 Tubby Estate on the bay. £500. 12months ticket. Clean as hell.
I'm damn tempted to chop the corset in for that. It's newer too!
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 24 Oct 2011 11:17 pm
I'm getting a pretty reliable 30mpg-ish around town too, keeping off boost. More miles per mellons than the valver, that's for certain.
-
Butterz
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011 04:53 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Butterz » 24 Oct 2011 11:34 pm
If you're about wednesday night gimme a bell. Found a nice hooning spot the other night

'77 Chevette
'85 360 GLS
'97 460 CD *sold*
-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 24 Oct 2011 11:36 pm
I'm working but if it's near town(ish) I could take a 1.5hr lunch break

About midnight?
-
Butterz
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011 04:53 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Butterz » 25 Oct 2011 12:23 am
Sounds spot on! Avonmouth too far?
'77 Chevette
'85 360 GLS
'97 460 CD *sold*
-
Ride_on
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: 26 May 2009 05:34 pm
- Location: Belfast, N. Ireland
Post
by Ride_on » 25 Oct 2011 01:52 am
Chris_C wrote:
I've very little clue when it comes to turbo's, but my take was "more boost == more turbo spinning therefore more heat from the friction" getting you to law of diminishing returns. Bigger turbo means slower spinning and that law is pushed about xxbhp down the line?
A turbo is just a fixed pressure creater, if the pressure setting is constant the engine will not see any more atoms of air air no matter what size the turbo or how fast it spins. However you might spend less BHP squeezing the exhaust gas through a small turbo wastegate and have more left for the wheels on a bigger one.
1980 345 DL_______1987 360 GLE (project car restored to GLT spec and B230FT'd)
1984 360 GLT______1987 360 GLT
1983 360 GLS______1989 360 GLE
1985 340 GL_______1986 340 1.4
1985 360 GLS______1995 940 SE 2.3 Turbo Estate (daily)
1987 340 GL 1.7
-
jon-ovlov
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: 30 Jul 2010 09:45 pm
- Location: Bristol/Birmingham
Post
by jon-ovlov » 25 Oct 2011 05:55 pm
hooning!? avonmouth?! midnight?! im there!!
Speedy88 wrote:
Leave choke on, idling obnoxiously until neighbours peer out windows at the noisy exhaust
Give neighbours thumbs up
Rev engine to 7K
Exit street sideways
Win at life.
-
volvosneverdie
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon
Post
by volvosneverdie » 25 Oct 2011 06:00 pm
Chris_C wrote:Having just been looking at big bricks, why the hell do people buy 300's anymore?
940 Tubby Estate on the bay. £500. 12months ticket. Clean as hell.
I'm damn tempted to chop the corset in for that. It's newer too!
I have been saying this for some time.
Everyone needs a Turbowagon.
EVERYONE!!
EEEEEEEEVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 25 Oct 2011 06:11 pm
I hope I've started a trend. Especially as I'm hanging around

-
Speedy88
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by Speedy88 » 25 Oct 2011 06:19 pm
Butterz wrote:Sounds spot on! Avonmouth too far?
Hum, it'll take me half an hour to get there so it is, a bit. Raincheck for 2 weekends away? (11th - 13th) Hmmm. 13th. Sunday night?
