Good modern crap?
Posted: 16 Aug 2010 07:17 pm
Here's an idea for a topic, post a picture of a car made since 1995 that you like. Then wait for everyone to go "YUK" and slate you
I'll go first


http://www.volvo300mania.com/uk/forum/



You must do 30 road rallies in v300 and remember to thank great Volvo from v300 every evening from that comment and don't forget to put money into charity chest on your way outChris_C wrote:I'm going to get shot, but this.... was remarkably awesome to drive. It had feel AND it had balance. Interior was made out of the inside of a chocolate box (but then so is anything Japanese) and the seats were horrific (but it is still driving around with Fake's originals in)

Evo X, i simply adore those! a highpower japanese turbo(or twinturbo)-charged motor will probably be my next ride after i finish the 340Turbo and 343, Evo could be up but it will be a 7 or 8; or a skyline R33/R34; or a mk4 supra; jummy!Speedy88 wrote:http://www.tuningnews.net/news/070109/m ... totype.jpg




He has a point though, it's one of those cars that's bad in so many ways but atleast you're involved in the driving experience. So many moderns remove that element from the process which is why people use their mobile phones and get distracted by a myriad other things whilst driving, it's because they're bored sh*tlessSteveP wrote:Honestly Chris... I was hovering over the ban button then![]()
Perhaps I was being a little bit harsh... because I wholeheartedly agree with the above... Also kinda agree on the Panda too as long as its the Panda 100RobT_75 wrote:He has a point though, it's one of those cars that's bad in so many ways but atleast you're involved in the driving experience. So many moderns remove that element from the process
I totally agree on the R35, there is a japenese importer in town here who owns one and i saw this beast driving behind me last night and its a car i wanted to overtake me....the noise as it went past on full chat was unbelievable and stupidly quick. I have never seen acceleration like it!!volvodspec wrote:
my contribution:
![]()


