Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
User avatar
V6 Man
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1204
Joined: 27 Jul 2004 11:36 pm
Location: Belper, Derbyshire UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by V6 Man » 12 May 2011 06:07 pm

To be honest we need more info about the person concerned. There's no point suggesting an MG Midget if it's a 17yr old girl whose only interests are clubbing.

I'm guessing the person concerned is female given that the original suggestions from Foggy have been Micra, Skoda or 340. Given that classic insurance is a option I'm also guessing she's mid to late twenties. I also guess she likes cars, but has no real mechanical knowledge (yet) and has recently learned to drive.

Thus I conclude we're talking about Ruth!

Right, that helps narrow it down - MG's, Spitfires etc are all too cantankerous for her to realistically cope with at this stage, Beetles are good, but she isn't a hippy. What's the budget? £500? £1000? £2000? Normally I'd recommend a Nissan Figaro as they share a lot of mechanical bits with the Micra so should be easy to get spares for, they're Japanese and reliable, there's a good fan base and they're cool and funky. However, a good one is upwards of £3k so probably out of budget.

These are my ideas (not going to talk about the 340 as we all know about them!);

Honda CRX Mk1 / Mazda MX5 / Toyota MR-2 - for pretty much the same reasons as the Figaro, but they're cheaper.

All are above the 1.4 mark in engine size, but MX5 aside are reasonably cheap, reliable, different and have a good following. However, they may be a bit too 'common' and chavvy for her.

Morris Minor or Mini (or Riley Elf/Austin Se7en etc etc etc) - cheap reliable fun, but maybe a bit too maintenace heavy/rot prone. Image:- 'Arty type' for the Moggie, 'cheeky' for the Mini.

VW Golf Mk1/2 - uber sensible, uber safe, uber boring and conservative. Upmarket image, but no sense the owner is fun or left-field.

MG F - better cars than expected, good club/owners scene, but engines may be too big and possibly a bit too 'tarty'.

Renault 5 - cheap, cheerful, full of Gallic charm, not too bad on rot/reliability and shares parts with a 340.

Citroen AX - as above but without the parts sharing.

I wouldn't go for the Pug 205 as they're too troublesome IMHO.

Finally, if she isn't doing great distances, I'd honestly recommend the Citroen 2CV - got to be reliable as there's nothing to go wrong, great fun, quirky, cheap to run, a hoot to drive and best of her her Dad has loads of them so he can fix it when required, not you!!



On another note re classic insurance most companies won't touch under 25's (Ruth's Ok, but just in case anyone else had ideas), most require the car to be off the road at night (driveway minimum, garage preferred), a lot want you to have a 'daily' car and annual mileage is restricted. There's also the fact that you don't get to build up a NCB so if you ever move away from a classic to something newer you have to start from scratch.
Terms and conditions apply. This post may go down as well as up. Regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Hard hats to be worn. No reversing without a banksman. No admittance to unauthorized persons. Stop that. Put that down. Leave that alone.

User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by jtbo » 12 May 2011 06:21 pm

How about Civic? CRX is just different looking Civic and some 90's 1.3 Civic with injection has good interior space, while not being very large car, they are reliable, but part prices are bit high, also insurance might be bit high because of chavs.

Very low petrol consumption, especially lean burn models which are of course newer and not really for classic insurance.
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage

macplaxton
Posts: 3283
Joined: 09 Feb 2008 02:29 am

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by macplaxton » 12 May 2011 09:17 pm

I always hesistate to recommend a classic or older vehicle for those on a limited budget, unless they're in it for the right reasons - love of the car. If they're *just* in it for cheapness the classic in question is just one custodian away from the scrapyard. :|
72 DAF 44 Estate 78 Volvo 343DL Black BeautyImageImage
82 Volvo 343DL CVTImageImage 88 Volvo 340DL Diesel

User avatar
V6 Man
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1204
Joined: 27 Jul 2004 11:36 pm
Location: Belper, Derbyshire UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by V6 Man » 12 May 2011 09:25 pm

Just had another thought -

Suzuki Cappuccino.


Like a Figaro only cheaper
Terms and conditions apply. This post may go down as well as up. Regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Hard hats to be worn. No reversing without a banksman. No admittance to unauthorized persons. Stop that. Put that down. Leave that alone.

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by SteveP » 12 May 2011 09:27 pm

Rust Rust Rust!
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

germ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1222
Joined: 15 Nov 2006 08:14 pm
Location: Hitchin Herts England - South Of France - NI Ards

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by germ » 12 May 2011 10:26 pm

^^ issues lol

as much as rust is a problem not alll cars are Rusty beyond believe, get a classic with 12months ticket run for a year asses the situation if its not re ticket-able sell it to someone that can sort it, that way you get the joy of a classic for minimum cost but also keep out of the scrappy, may sound bad but if you think about it it could be worse and it will most likely live on. only problem i see with this approach is getting attached to it, thus making it impossible to part with a plunging crap loads of dough into it, which is what i would do :lol:
Volvo 340 Image 1988

User avatar
Chris_C
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9600
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by Chris_C » 13 May 2011 12:26 am

V6 Man wrote:Just had another thought -

Suzuki Cappuccino.


Like a Figaro only cheaper
SteveP wrote:Rust Rust Rust!
For once the Brummie is actually right... as much as I love the Cap, they are far worse than 300's are even though they are 5-15 years younger. Foggy would be welding all summer ;)
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast

User avatar
foggyjames
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9361
Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by foggyjames » 13 May 2011 02:43 am

I am indeed talking about Ruth. She wants a car, but has very little money at present to spend on making it happen. Insurance is by far the biggest worry, as she has only recently passed her test. Perhaps the thread title and question was misleading. I'm looking for the most "sensible / normal" thing I can get away with insuring as a classic, essentially. The Micra or Felicia are ideal, but undoubtedly far too new to be insured as classics. I'm ideally looking for something similarly sensible / boring...but just old enough to be insured as a classic. The budget is as little as possible - under £500, ideally. Anything "sexy" is out of the question on purchase price grounds...even a half-decent Golf is probably scene-taxed out of range. A mk2 Golf would be high up my list if it weren't for the price issue. I don't think she's at all fussy about what she has...although she has long wanted one of these...

http://www.carthrottle.com/wp-content/u ... /E28-1.jpg

I appreciate that the actual answer to this question will come from an insurance company. I was just seeking help with brain storming. The 205 is the best idea I've heard so far, although I think I'd still favour a 340 on safety grounds. Seen too many comprehensively folded up 80s French superminis. 300s might not be up to modern standards, but they were pretty amazing in their day.

I suppose the bottom line is this. A Felicia and a good 340 cost roughly the same, and all else being equal, the Skoda is the better car for a young female driver who has recently passed her test and barely gives a rat's ass about cars. However, Felicia insurance is about £800. If it's half that for the 340 on a classic policy, it's worth looking into. I need to make a few calls...

cheers

James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...

User avatar
trabitom99
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 4398
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 02:38 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by trabitom99 » 13 May 2011 09:23 am

Is a MkII Golf really that expensive in the UK? Here excellent examples can be snapped up for well under a grand even though their numbers are dwindling fast ...

I don't think they're boring at all. An early MkII around 1985, in brown metallic, some kind of special edition spec, OEM alloys and 90 bhp? Much more interesting than a Skoda.

This is what I'm thinking of:
Image

or this:
Image

One of the most durable cars ever, along with a Merc 190E, but that would be pushing the budget a bit.

Tom
343 GL Touring B14.1E CVT (155) 98000kms 1980 (sold)
343 L Junior B14.3E MT4 (155) 229000kms 1981 (scrapped)
343 DLS B19A MT4 (155) 167900kms 1982
360 GL Injection B200F MT5 (231) 348598kms 1988 (scrapped)
360 GLT B200F MT5 (302) 230000kms 1988

User avatar
Speedy88
Posts: 4057
Joined: 04 May 2009 11:52 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by Speedy88 » 13 May 2011 04:11 pm

Yes the scene tax on them is quite incredible. You can pick up examples for under a grand but they'll need some work. Saying that, they WOULD last forever.
'88 340 Williams (Sold)
'85 360 GLS - Drift project (Sold)
'77 Colt Sigma
'96 940 Drift project

MCHUDD
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 2537
Joined: 18 May 2006 03:43 pm
Location: BELFAST UNITED KINGDOM

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by MCHUDD » 13 May 2011 04:39 pm

Hi James.
A mate of mines son is realy into 80s early 90s VW Polos.
Great looking cars. Cheap to buy and run.
Cheers Mark. sm4

User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by jtbo » 13 May 2011 04:51 pm

Safety and classic insurance is quite difficult combo, as we all know, it was not until mid 90's when other than Swedish car makers did pay attention to it and it took few years until really good ones started to roll out.

We do have a system where you can take car off from road and then take it back, during that time insurance costs next to nothing. If you have similar system which is not impossible to use in practise, then it might be one possible way to cut tax, driving only part of the year?
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage

User avatar
V6 Man
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1204
Joined: 27 Jul 2004 11:36 pm
Location: Belper, Derbyshire UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by V6 Man » 13 May 2011 05:56 pm

Ok, I had no idea that Cappuccino's were so good at rusting.

I reckon it comes down to a Mk2 Golf. (Did the 1.3's get PAS?), A early 1990's Honda Civic hatch (pref one of the 'special' editions that got some extra toys), a Clio or a 2CV.

To be honest the Civic is probably the best bet as the base model ones don't suffer from scene tax. A 1.3 (for low tax) is pretty nippy and frugal too, they handle well, look quite chic and sporty (esp the hatch in red) and are very reliable. My mum had a 1993 one from new and in 10 years did 125k with nothing other than routine servicing, tyres and brakes.
Terms and conditions apply. This post may go down as well as up. Regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Hard hats to be worn. No reversing without a banksman. No admittance to unauthorized persons. Stop that. Put that down. Leave that alone.

User avatar
foggyjames
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9361
Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by foggyjames » 13 May 2011 06:28 pm

Yeah, I'm worried that good mk2 Golfs are going to be too expensive. A friend just sold a very tidy 1986 1.3...that was a lovely car.

EH2 Civic...now there's a thought!
Image

All depends on what the insurers say. I just got a quote for £120 on a 340 1.4 (vs 3-400 for regular insurance), so there is the potential for major savings. I'll try a call on Monday...

cheers

James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...

User avatar
Chris_C
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9600
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Re: Cheap "classic" - opinions, please!

Post by Chris_C » 13 May 2011 08:26 pm

The Civic pre that is pretty awesome, the wedge one. Else, cheap mk2 golfs and equiv polos are very cheap, a few 1.3 ones have sold round here recently for less than 300.
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast

Post Reply