Injection to Carbs

A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Injection to Carbs

Post by SteveP » 24 Feb 2008 10:11 pm

Evening chaps...

Right, well I've bought Rich's (Volvo360GLS) B230K and Weber 40's along with my K cam to go in my 360 which is injection. Just wondering if anyone knows what I'd need for this... I assume a FI > Carb fuel pressure regulator to step the fuel pressure down and the fuel pump blanking plate from the B200E fitted to the 230K. Can anyone else see any other complexities?

Also, are 40's big enough for such a capacity?
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

Bilbo
Posts: 434
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 12:55 pm
Location: N/E England

Post by Bilbo » 24 Feb 2008 10:25 pm

Depends on the chamber/jet sizes,what they came off etc,but with the right ones they'll be ok imo....I'd bang em on and get it running for a trip to the local RR man! You wouldbt want it running lean on cam or rich off cam etc....
Y + A plate both 1983 & D plate 1987 3door 360 Glt's

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 24 Feb 2008 10:33 pm

Bilbo wrote:I'd bang em on and get it running for a trip to the local RR man! You wouldbt want it running lean on cam or rich off cam etc....
That's most definitely the plan :)
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

sven360
Posts: 1856
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 11:36 pm
Location: up shitcreek

Post by sven360 » 24 Feb 2008 10:50 pm

Try and get some K+N's or similar rather than those sock thingies.
Caused many an underbonnet malady as Bilbo knows.

The neighbours are goin' to love you on a cold morning :lol:
Keeper of The Knights' of Bushido-lest we forget

Write it in your heart.
Stand by the code and it will stand by you.

Ask no more and give no less than honesty,courage,loyalty,generosity and fairness.

The code of the West.

User avatar
Carl
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1275
Joined: 17 Jan 2004 12:29 pm
Location: Southampton, UK
Contact:

Post by Carl » 24 Feb 2008 11:20 pm

When I was looking at the same conversion I'd decided that 40s should be ok but they'd be at their limits. 45s would be much better, but obviously the price jump is quite substantial and may not justify the potential benefits.
Carl
Rover SD1 Vitesse (and no Volvos :()
But previously:
1988 Volvo 360GLT
1988 Volvo 360GLT
1984 Volvo 340DL
www.carlgibbs.com/gallery

User avatar
Jason B
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 909
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 09:18 pm
Location: Bridport, Dorset and Southampton

Post by Jason B » 25 Feb 2008 12:52 am

for that engine 40's ought to be fine, the 230fk has the pretty appalling 631 head which makes it interference and has combustion chambers milled into the pistons iirc so I'd imagine the webers won't quite run out of puff reaching full potential. Should still see a nice 140 ish bhp from the engine though.
'89 360 GLE awaiting 2.3 power

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 25 Feb 2008 01:20 am

Yeah, tis the 631 head - heard mixed things about it too... but with a K cam any redblock would surely be interference, so that really doesn't matter too much. :) Wasn't aware of the combustion chambers being like that though
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

User avatar
Jason B
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 909
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 09:18 pm
Location: Bridport, Dorset and Southampton

Post by Jason B » 25 Feb 2008 01:27 am

still, I know you got the engine seriously seriously cheeeep! as I know what price I turned it down at when I realised it was a 230fk (only on basis that I couldn't really justify driving that far for an engine which isn't compatible with my b230fb)

Not exactly sure on how much lift makes each 2.3l lump interference and tbh I don't really care either (H-cam on the way ;))

With the carb conversion once the fuel pump is sorted I would just try and scrounge some jets similar to a ford 2.3 as there is probably loads of info on them and the 8v's won't be hugely different.
'89 360 GLE awaiting 2.3 power

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 25 Feb 2008 01:35 am

Yeah, it should work out ok then with the 40's it seems! So does anyone know what the stock carb fuel pump is like, is it like a B14 one in the side of the block? I assume I can use the blanking plate from my 360 and run the electric fuel pump still :)
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

meintag
Posts: 190
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 07:36 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post by meintag » 25 Feb 2008 02:05 am

I've the same plan, and I want to tune the carbs with a wideband lambda sensor. A LC1 from innovate motorsports + a RPM module is 'cheap' and effective.

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/products/lc1.php

For the pump, I'll run a continuous electric fuel pump from Carter in the US... High flow capacity and very low pressure. No FPR is needed. Tomorrow I look for a reference to you :wink:

40s will be fine IMO

Greetz from Spain !!

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 25 Feb 2008 12:20 pm

Thanks meintag! :)
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

User avatar
Nikdev
Posts: 405
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 09:11 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Nikdev » 25 Feb 2008 01:10 pm

40 are a bit small on the b200, but it will be fine as it don't rev that much. But why a K cam? Get a h-cam :wink:

Tourinki
Posts: 231
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 04:02 pm
Location: Lieksa, Finland

Post by Tourinki » 25 Feb 2008 01:25 pm

Nikdev wrote:40 are a bit small on the b200, but it will be fine as it don't rev that much. But why a K cam? Get a h-cam :wink:
A friend of mine once told me that diffence between H and K is just few precent and racey idle. So i would go for the one which i can find easier and cheaper.
1999 Volvo S80 T6 Quiet long distance cruiser.
1990 Volvo 360 GLi Waiting inspiration.
1989 Toyota Land Cruiser For days when wellies aren't enough inside the car.
1987 Volvo 360 GLi Being restored.
1986 Volvo 740 Turbo Sold, but not forgotten.

User avatar
Jason B
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 909
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 09:18 pm
Location: Bridport, Dorset and Southampton

Post by Jason B » 25 Feb 2008 01:32 pm

Bit more torque etc, not hugely different but still better :D I would have bought the cheapest as well, but luckily I found an H with adjustable gear for less than I'd get a K for in the UK :D
'89 360 GLE awaiting 2.3 power

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7933
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 25 Feb 2008 02:16 pm

K cam because I already have one... and it was cheap ;)
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

Post Reply