The 'budget' Translated

A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
User avatar
MJ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1933
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Devon/Staffordshire, UK

Post by MJ » 18 Mar 2008 01:33 am

You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but never all of the people all of the time.

I fully agree with you Jason; our car only does a couple thousand miles a year, and it's a pain that we have to pay just the same amount of tax as if it did ten times that.

Having said that, if I had a job that involved tens of thousands of miles of driving every year, I'd be complaining about my right to drive freely without being charged per mile/gallon.

Taxing per mile is obviously the fairest way of charging based on road usage, but I'm fully against that due to the cost, complexity and erosion of privacy issues. I'm in the mood for quotes, and just discovered this gem related to loss of privacy and freedoms. It applies just as much to the UK "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Taxing per litre of fuel would be a far simpler way of achieving a similar result, and is better related to environmental harm. A pain if you drive a V8 monster though :P It would also tax those who drive around like hoons more that those of us who tootle about slowly :P

Basicly, I dunno, but a mix of a fixed yearly tax and a fuel based tax seemes the best balance.
Image

User avatar
Chris_C
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9600
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by Chris_C » 18 Mar 2008 08:43 am

MJ wrote:Taxing per litre of fuel would be a far simpler way of achieving a similar result, and is better related to environmental harm. A pain if you drive a V8 monster though :P It would also tax those who drive around like hoons more that those of us who tootle about slowly :P
They do that anyway ;) Tbh, as much as I moan about road tax, it's the cheapest thing about running a car already :(
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast

User avatar
MJ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1933
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Devon/Staffordshire, UK

Post by MJ » 18 Mar 2008 12:57 pm

Yeah, I realise that :P Petrol would be what, 20p a litre or something with no tax. I was just thinking allowed about ways there are of fairly taxing car use. :)
Image

User avatar
Jason B
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 909
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 09:18 pm
Location: Bridport, Dorset and Southampton

Post by Jason B » 18 Mar 2008 01:03 pm

trouble is with switching completely to "pay at pump" tax is that it would be hard to stop the government effectively increasing total tax on the sly during the switchover
'89 360 GLE awaiting 2.3 power

User avatar
MJ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1933
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Devon/Staffordshire, UK

Post by MJ » 18 Mar 2008 01:06 pm

Who was suggesting completely switching?
Image

User avatar
Jason B
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 909
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 09:18 pm
Location: Bridport, Dorset and Southampton

Post by Jason B » 18 Mar 2008 02:32 pm

it was mentioned a while back as an option by some government watchdog type thingy
'89 360 GLE awaiting 2.3 power

Post Reply