340, ugly? Surely not!

A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
workshopmanualman
Posts: 188
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

340, ugly? Surely not!

Post by workshopmanualman » 19 Nov 2008 09:05 am

Lazy journalists pumping out the same old tosh. http://www.virginmedia.com/motoring/gal ... php?ssid=6
I blame the Volvo 66 estate I had......

User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Post by Edcase 300 » 19 Nov 2008 02:37 pm

hi workshopmanualman :D

haha i just read that article!
I honestly wonder if the journalist who wrote that ostracizing article has ever even driven a 340 or 360 for that matter?

Hes probably a bit antiquated in the driving department.
Its just a typical example of journalistic gluttony to earn a few extra bucks and follow a silly chip on the shoulder trend.
haha :) I feel satisfied now :D

Hehe- well I like you think that the Volvo 300 series is smashing little car 8)
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)

User avatar
nomead
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 297
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 08:47 am
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by nomead » 19 Nov 2008 03:50 pm

Heh, and they found a Finnish picture, of all things.
Volvo 340DL Variomatic -89
Volvo 360GLT -86

User avatar
filthyjohn
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 2693
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 09:07 pm
Location: Sunderland, Ringpiece Of England

Post by filthyjohn » 19 Nov 2008 08:31 pm

Lazy journalism. As if the writer of that piece has ever driven one. I'm cancelling my Virgin Media services because of this.
'87 Nissan Sunny
'95 945 LPT
'90 340 3dr
'87 360 GLT
'87 765 TIC
'75 Manta A
'70 Rover P5 V8
'67 MGB GT
'62 amazon 2dr

User avatar
MJ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1933
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Devon/Staffordshire, UK

Post by MJ » 19 Nov 2008 08:47 pm

I can thing of better reasons to cancel Virgin Media :lol:

If you do, make sure to tell them why!
Image

User avatar
filthyjohn
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 2693
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 09:07 pm
Location: Sunderland, Ringpiece Of England

Post by filthyjohn » 19 Nov 2008 08:55 pm

This house has no BT line so I'm stuck with them. I'll just have to make sure this month's direct debit bounces. Although, that happens every month :lol:
'87 Nissan Sunny
'95 945 LPT
'90 340 3dr
'87 360 GLT
'87 765 TIC
'75 Manta A
'70 Rover P5 V8
'67 MGB GT
'62 amazon 2dr

Stefan
Posts: 179
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 07:51 pm
Location: codnor derbyshire

Post by Stefan » 19 Nov 2008 08:57 pm

:shock: just a tit with no real idea what he is talking about. i have had a few cars on that list and loved them and would like a few of the others. Still never was a fan of the x90 but each to there own
1978 Volvo 343 DL Black Beauty (sold)
1976 Volvo 66GL estate sold
1976 Daf 46 van (sold)
1972 Daf 55 coupe for sale
1974 Daf 33 van sold
1968 Daf Pony
1964 Daf 31

User avatar
Ronnie
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1401
Joined: 27 Oct 2005 03:23 am
Location: Inverness
Contact:

Post by Ronnie » 19 Nov 2008 09:17 pm

I wouldn't lose any sleep over that ass-hat - number 5 on the list is a TVR Tuscan, possibly the most beautiful car ever built. I bet he drives a Vauxhall Vectra...
'85 360GLT Mk2 3 Door B19E - SOLD
'94 L400 Mitsubishi Delica LWB

http://www.filterfeeder.eu

workshopmanualman
Posts: 188
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

Ugly?

Post by workshopmanualman » 19 Nov 2008 10:39 pm

Man, I drove a Vectra a few years ago. Within a mile I was bored stiff. A few years ago I looked into buying a Honda Joy Machine - name was bad enough, but I sat in it, got out, walked away without even starting the engine. I'll admit the Volvo can be a bit ugly in the wrong colour schemes, but it isn't a bad car to drive by any means. Mine is my work car that I use instead of the train into London - my wife has a new car with all the bells and whistles, so my yardstick to judge the 360 against is a £14k car. The new car is good, but a little boring to drive [it even applies the brakes a little harder if it feels you're a numpty....]. The Volvo? Bounces all over the place, is noisy, hot, and a bit smelly. Sometimes it doesn't want to start. But I don't drive it like a moron, I'm aware of what goes on around me, and I'm oddly content driving the thing. So there Mr Ten Ugly Cars!
I blame the Volvo 66 estate I had......

User avatar
MJ
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1933
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Devon/Staffordshire, UK

Re: Ugly?

Post by MJ » 19 Nov 2008 11:29 pm

workshopmanualman wrote:The Volvo? Bounces all over the place, is noisy, hot, and a bit smelly. Sometimes it doesn't want to start. But I don't drive it like a moron, I'm aware of what goes on around me, and I'm oddly content driving the thing.
Quoted For Truth :)
Image

nomashedswede
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 73
Joined: 15 Dec 2007 01:25 pm
Location: Birmingham,England.

Post by nomashedswede » 20 Nov 2008 12:05 am

I`m going to apologise in advance for the length of this reply, but does this so called journalist know that research is an integral part of writing anything intended for publication ! Or is his ignorance so complete, he thinks himself above it.

1, "Ladas were ugly, weak, beige and very, very cheap. As such, they were pretty popular but you really don’t see many of the old 1980s models anymore. Thank heavens." Whilst I wouldn`t disagree with most of this, there rarity is more due to the fact that all the ones in the UK were repatriated by Russian sailors originally, and then the Russian mafia got involved and cleared the UK out. I know, I sold them loads of second hand ones - thank you Mr Gorbachev and peristroika - happy days !

2, "Famously, Skoda has re-invented itself. Slightly. It’s now marginally cooler than it was in the 1980s with Skoda now partnered with Renault." Hmmm - has anybody informed Volkswagen that their Chzech mistress, is now in a dalliance with a French suitor ?

5, "it’s difficult to lay insult on a solid British car manufacturer, seeing as there are so few these days," Thought TVR factory had been closed, and they are now to be made in Russia - anybody in Blackpool confirm this ?

8, "British Leyland was going through very tough times during the Allegro’s launch and refused to fall in line with more popular approaches to cars at the time. The hatchback was becoming king, British Leyland stubbornly refused to produce them. A relic, if ever there was one. Just like the Allegro."
So the Austin Maxi - the ONLY hatchback on the market when it was launched, was obviously made by another company !

What a to**er - and presumably, he gets paid for this drivel !
"Any society that would give up it`s freedoms to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both"

User avatar
hatch360
Posts: 287
Joined: 17 Jun 2006 02:51 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by hatch360 » 20 Nov 2008 12:33 am

this journalist makes as if the competition was any better looking. The 80s for me was the ugly years for most cars, but the 300 series wasnt the worst, he just got a pic of an unkept one and attached some bs to it.

nomashedswede
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 73
Joined: 15 Dec 2007 01:25 pm
Location: Birmingham,England.

Post by nomashedswede » 20 Nov 2008 01:22 am

You make a good point, Oz - the 300 series just looks a bit out of time, but that`s testament to it`s longevity. Certainly in the UK, I cannot think of another 80`s survivor, that appears so regularly, or in , often, such good condition ( with the exception of 240`s and 740`s, of course ! )
"Any society that would give up it`s freedoms to gain a little security, will deserve neither and lose both"

workshopmanualman
Posts: 188
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

3 series anybody?

Post by workshopmanualman » 20 Nov 2008 09:32 am

Odd that, isn't it, about the competition still being around. BMW 3-series seem a bit thin on the ground, and oddly so are the Escorts of the time - but they may have been killed due to their popularity. Only the Golf seems to exist in similar numbers to the 340, but given that they sold a zillion of the things, then the Volvo is doing better statistically. The Merc 190E seems to be the only other car around of that era that just runs and runs. But to me the Merc has associations with people that live in caravans, so I wouldn't have one for that reason! Shallow I am.

And of the 340 / 360's that I see, it seems that there is a 50/50 split between them being in really good condition or bad. Either way, they are still running. I am not offended by him calling the car ugly, or particularly bothered by it. What it does mean is that small minded people avoid them, prices stay low, and yet here we have a car that is reliable, easy to service, and seems to exist in a vacuum on the road - I never get challenged by boy racers or have people up my chuff to get a move on.

In their day Volvo knew how to build a car, and didn't waste money on fancy frills like bodywork designers! Nuff said.
I blame the Volvo 66 estate I had......

User avatar
trabitom99
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 4398
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 02:38 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

Post by trabitom99 » 20 Nov 2008 11:12 am

It is of course easy saying a car is ugly, showing an unkempt vehicle with sun-bleached paint:

Image

If he had chosen to fill out his article with a picture like this:

Image

he would have had a much harder time of it ...

Tom
343 GL Touring B14.1E CVT (155) 98000kms 1980 (sold)
343 L Junior B14.3E MT4 (155) 229000kms 1981 (scrapped)
343 DLS B19A MT4 (155) 167900kms 1982
360 GL Injection B200F MT5 (231) 348598kms 1988 (scrapped)
360 GLT B200F MT5 (302) 230000kms 1988

Post Reply