Page 1 of 2

Exhaust's what do you think??

Posted: 03 Jan 2009 10:58 pm
by Bazboy
Hey guys,

Just wanted to get an idea of what everyones ideas on exhaust's were especially on cars with not a lot of power.

Ive always thought of exhausts being a bit stupid if there overly sized and overly loud and on a car still sporting hub caps, And for these reasons alone i never wanted a loud one, just something which looks nice.

Now over the week i set about making an exhaust with my mate to kill the time and warm us up and it actually took quite a bit of work and time considering the 340's over axel setup.

The almost finished product(still needs adjusting and sealing) looked really good cause its only a small tail pipe which pokes out just below the bumper but when i fired her up she sounded a fair bit louder then id hoped, im hoping this will go a soon as i finish it as it blows a fair bit atm but if it doesn't then im probably going to get another standard back box to bung back on.

But considering the work which went into it i dunno if ill want to revert back lol i think its loud because the rear silencer is pretty small so may just put a larger one on.

But anyways just wanted to get everyones views on modified exhaust's, so i dont turn up to a meet sounding and looking like more of a prat then i usually do :D

Cheers Dan

p.s will bung some pics up tomorrow when i find me camera.

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:15 am
by Bazboy
ok i whipped up a quick artist impression to give you all an idea:

Image

It sits higher up and doesn't poke so far out

Cheers Dan

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:18 am
by filthyjohn
I reckon I'll reserve judgement til the proper photo LOL. Unless it really has a 'Roger Rabbit' half-live action half-cartoon look, in which case I love it.

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:20 am
by sven360
Erm........... I think I'll wait to see the real pics.
Not quite sure what to make of that artists impression.
Did you alter the bore/remove middle box or owt????

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:27 am
by Bazboy
Nope left the middle box on, glad i did as i think it would of been mighty loud without lol and i left the bore as it was since it took long enough to just make the back section.

There is a back box but it is quite small, I just really wanted to see what the general consensus on exhaust was? cause i always thought they were frowned apon unless they did something power wise lol. Oh and the artist impression took less then a minute and my photo editing skills are terrible lol

Dan

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:29 am
by volvosneverdie
Bazboy wrote:
It sits higher up and doesn't poke so far out

Cheers Dan
Dont worry dan.
Thats completley normal for a boy your age.

:lol:

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:35 am
by Bazboy
volvosneverdie wrote:
Bazboy wrote:
It sits higher up and doesn't poke so far out

Cheers Dan
Dont worry dan.
Thats completley normal for a boy your age.

:lol:
Childish humor, but did make me laugh a fair bit. :D

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 12:37 am
by volvosneverdie
Yeah, school kids nationwide woldve been proud of that one like.

Sorry, but it had to be done.

:oops:

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 02:11 am
by jtbo
Bazboy wrote:ok i whipped up a quick artist impression to give you all an idea:
It sits higher up and doesn't poke so far out

Cheers Dan
Looks bit similar to what I have in my car:
Image

It actually does sit bit higher now as I managed to weld proper pieces of metal into it so it is not kept place by only with metal wire :roll:

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 02:23 pm
by kaos
ive got a 2.5" inch system to a 4.5" back box. But i am sporting a 1.8 16v and other pieces in mine....

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 05:35 pm
by filthyjohn
David vizard always says 2" of diameter per 100 horsepower is fine if it's a reasonable design.

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 06:34 pm
by kaos
filthyjohn wrote:David vizard always says 2" of diameter per 100 horsepower is fine if it's a reasonable design.
then 2.5" sounds resonable lol. its straight through lol just a back box :D

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 10:14 pm
by classicswede
Not like this then

Image

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 10:26 pm
by jtbo
Image

Posted: 04 Jan 2009 10:30 pm
by classicswede
nawt wrong with that :lol: