I don't understand why are all those cars the worst one ?
I see ford orion here, looking like it got hit by truck and still going on.
That jetta looks like Opel omega or kadet with long boot. I see them every day on our streets, even know few people who own them and keep them running cos, repairs are cheap .
For Lancia i know it's a piece of s*** cos it's crowded with electronic. One thing goes and you better buy new car, than repair it.
What's wrong with alfa romeo 33 1.7 T.spark ? Speed, accurate, works on Italian way ( not like clockwork, but so ). Ok parts are expensive ( like in every alfa ) and design could be done a bit better.
Don't tell me that alfa started it's "gold carrier" with alfa 75 V6 3.0 T.spark ?
Here ford Orion is kept mostly by Chinese people, filled to the roof by goods, clothes, chinese families...bla,bla... and no matter boot is nearly hitting the road at the back because of weight, they do not want to sell it.
Peugeot 309 ? Oh well, i can say it's a miss. Even it comfortable like every French car, design is very ugly.
Ah yes, and for Volvo 300 series. I will post a pic of my dad's crash in tractor at ~80 km/h as soon as i scan it.
1.4 is design to be the weakest Volvo 300 and it's not made for high speeds. Motor is weak and design for cruse. Slow, durable family car that get you anywhere in sometime ( 1.7 and 2.0 get you in no-time

)
It has all the security ( you all know design is the same for all 300 series, apart from motor and interior that can vary ) like any 300.
I'm not saying this cos i own one, it's because the unknown criteria he used to rate all of those cars as "the worst of 80's " category.
For other cars i can not say anything since i haven't seen them and wasn't driven in them.
Uh, i tired myself by writing this. I'm sorry for long post, you probably got bored by reading it.
Cheers
Ivan