
Photos
Re: Photos
I decide to take pic of my car with stars, but strange light appears to photo:


Re: Photos
Sun already?

Closer inspection reveals that it is not sun after all:

This is where battery finally gets flat, it was fully charged when I left


Closer inspection reveals that it is not sun after all:

This is where battery finally gets flat, it was fully charged when I left


Re: Photos
jtbo wrote:Sun already?
![]()


Awesome
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon
Re: Photos
Jani, your pics are awesome lately! 

1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
Re: Photos
Great Pics there,
What lense did you use to take the picture of the moon?
What lense did you use to take the picture of the moon?
Re: Photos
Thanks guys, your comments mean a lot
Close up from moon is taken with Tamron 70-300mm lens, I'm not happy to sharpness of that shot, but I guess it was because of there was so much dirty air as moon was so low.
It can do far better than that:

Those photos I posted are pretty much out from camera, all have resized, first and fourth have been rotated (it is amzingly hard to get them straight in dark when you don't really see a lot from finder), fifth has edited most as it is built up from 5 images so it has total exposure time of 2 minutes 30 seconds, seventh has had it's levels adjusted a bit, some sky filter would been nice for that shot, surpsisingly last pic was only resized
Close up from moon was around 1/60th of second exposure time ISO 200 and F might have been 8, that is out from memory, so could be wrong too. Other shots are 20-30 seconds ISO 1600 and F3.5 mostly for wide angles and 5.6-6.5 for narrower angles.
So to take pic from moon one could perhaps getaway without tripod, even 300mm requires quite fast shutter speed it migh be possible if using large aperture, but that of course limits quality a bit.
BTW has anyone ever dismantled Nikkor 18-55 DX II lens? I have one with gears broken, so I thought that I remove autofocus from it as it should work manually just fine and I don't use autfocus anyway. I could get it open, but there is two metal rings that somehow hold backplate on place so I really can't get gears out from it.
Those wide angle shots were taken with Nikkor 18-55mm AF which is lesser in image quality than that type II

Close up from moon is taken with Tamron 70-300mm lens, I'm not happy to sharpness of that shot, but I guess it was because of there was so much dirty air as moon was so low.
It can do far better than that:

Those photos I posted are pretty much out from camera, all have resized, first and fourth have been rotated (it is amzingly hard to get them straight in dark when you don't really see a lot from finder), fifth has edited most as it is built up from 5 images so it has total exposure time of 2 minutes 30 seconds, seventh has had it's levels adjusted a bit, some sky filter would been nice for that shot, surpsisingly last pic was only resized

Close up from moon was around 1/60th of second exposure time ISO 200 and F might have been 8, that is out from memory, so could be wrong too. Other shots are 20-30 seconds ISO 1600 and F3.5 mostly for wide angles and 5.6-6.5 for narrower angles.
So to take pic from moon one could perhaps getaway without tripod, even 300mm requires quite fast shutter speed it migh be possible if using large aperture, but that of course limits quality a bit.
BTW has anyone ever dismantled Nikkor 18-55 DX II lens? I have one with gears broken, so I thought that I remove autofocus from it as it should work manually just fine and I don't use autfocus anyway. I could get it open, but there is two metal rings that somehow hold backplate on place so I really can't get gears out from it.
Those wide angle shots were taken with Nikkor 18-55mm AF which is lesser in image quality than that type II
Re: Photos
I get to post some again 





Plus a random poncey picture that I stil can't get the hang of... if only arty things were as easy to take as technical things







Plus a random poncey picture that I stil can't get the hang of... if only arty things were as easy to take as technical things


'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: 12 Sep 2006 09:07 pm
- Location: Sunderland, Ringpiece Of England
Re: Photos
Hey nice snaps Mr C.
All taken in the New Forest?
All taken in the New Forest?
'87 Nissan Sunny
'95 945 LPT
'90 340 3dr
'87 360 GLT
'87 765 TIC
'75 Manta A
'70 Rover P5 V8
'67 MGB GT
'62 amazon 2dr
'95 945 LPT
'90 340 3dr
'87 360 GLT
'87 765 TIC
'75 Manta A
'70 Rover P5 V8
'67 MGB GT
'62 amazon 2dr
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon
Re: Photos
Looks like youve been out on a nice stag weekend there chris. Hope it wasnt too deer.
On a serious not though, good shootin man.
Awesome wildlifery.

On a serious not though, good shootin man.
Awesome wildlifery.
Re: Photos
Spot on dude, I got super lucky, there was a herd(sp?)/flock/lot of themfilthyjohn wrote:All taken in the New Forest?

Also got round to uploading a couple from that Duxford trip I mentioned months ago... shame the sky was quite so poor, twas raining most of the day so my 300mm wasn't happy.


'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon
Re: Photos
Hurricane and a thunderbolt?Chris_C wrote:
Also got round to uploading a couple from that Duxford trip I mentioned months ago... shame the sky was quite so poor, twas raining most of the day so my 300mm wasn't happy.
-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 5432
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004 10:18 am
- Location: MILTON KEYNES , ENGLAND
Re: Photos
Hurricane and a thunderbolt?[/quote]volvosneverdie wrote:
thank feck you never joined the Raf
its a North American P-51 mustang and a supermarine spitfire in the top one

-
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 11 Nov 2008 04:22 pm
- Location: Newcastle Upon Toon