Page 8 of 44

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 02:07 am
by jtbo
Not very good photo, but thought that I would share it, that tries to show our galaxy, but exposure time is very short so glow is very faint.

Image

I try to do bit better when there is better weather.

Something like this would be nice to get someday:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/communications ... -large.jpg

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 10:00 am
by volvosneverdie
All very very impressive.

Well done to all the v3m snappers.

Get some prints done, and put together a v3m callendar?

Id buy one.

Would help toward hosting fees?

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 10:05 am
by SteveP
Awesome pic Jani... what kit are you using to get shots like that?

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 05:51 pm
by jtbo
SteveP wrote:Awesome pic Jani... what kit are you using to get shots like that?
That is taken with Nikon D40 with kit lens that is 18-55mm Nikkor so not very special really :lol:

I have no idea what they have used to one I linked, but I can guess it being something that costs more than my house :shock:

Magic to star photo comes from software, I use Deep Sky Stacker, Irix and Registax 4, those are free and complicated to use at first, but with little try and error I'm getting better every time.

It is just too cloudy weathers, now is dark time of year, but also very cloudy, at spring there is less clouds, but it is too bright to get good shots.

Oh yes, also you must remember that I live at country, when streetlamps fail (happens now and then) here it is almost pitch black outside, with my bare eyes I can see easily double amount of stars when compared to are I did live before.

If there are no clouds and lights are out, I can see clearly where Milky Way is, that is something that will not show up at near cities.

Still, you can see how there is hint of orange colour at bottom of pic, that light is 30km away where next city is, so if I take very long exposures it could be a problem.

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 06:49 pm
by redline
volvosneverdie wrote:

Get some prints done, and put together a v3m callendar?
umm havent we been here before :lol: :lol:


http://www.volvo300mania.com/forum-uk/v ... r+calendar

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 07:47 pm
by volvosneverdie
Sorry, im still quite new.

And i meant something sellable.

Not something to terrify children into wetting the bed.

:o

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 07:51 pm
by redline
dont worry , you will soon get used to us

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 07:53 pm
by jtbo
redline wrote: umm havent we been here before :lol: :lol:


http://www.volvo300mania.com/forum-uk/v ... r+calendar
I believe it had something to do with Miss August that we did not see printed version, must be those pointy eared midgets that are be held responsible from theft of prints?

I must suggest that next time we must use models not so pointy eared midged type :lol:

Posted: 06 Dec 2008 08:15 pm
by jtbo
Those interested from taking photos of stars might find this interesting link:
http://www.lightpollution.it/dmsp/numstar.html

Cursed street lamps I say, I live in area that has 700-1000 stars visible, I believe this is closer to 1000, but overlighting our land is really a problem that green bandwagon should take in their machinery, I would love to see ban of street lamps with minor exceptions :D

If you happen to live in red area it is impossible for you to get very good photos of stars or at least very challenging that will be.

This could be result even with clear sky and it is horrible future we seem to head into, everyone plays with their computer inside keeping thick curtains closed, nobody walks outside even it is lit to daylight levels:
Image

Posted: 07 Dec 2008 09:51 pm
by jtbo
Some may wonder why my pics are always taken at dark hours, answer to that is that during day I'm at work and during weekends it is very uninterestingly cloudy scene that I see ;)

But these aren't too bad, right?

Image

Posted: 07 Dec 2008 11:14 pm
by token
these are very cool pics 8)

Posted: 09 Dec 2008 06:02 pm
by jtbo
Image

Photo taken with Canon Digital Ixus 75, which does not have manual setting for short exposures, so normally moon will come out as huge bright glow, but I was tricky and pointed camera towards car headlamp, put trigger half way down and after that pointed to moon and pushed trigger fully down, this way I tricked camera to use shorter exposure time ;)

Also I did set focus to infinity and exposure compensation to -2.

There was bit of fog or clouds at high above so it did not come out very clearly, also no tripod or any other support was used.

Damn I hate that I did not get my another camera with me + tripod.

Posted: 10 Dec 2008 01:51 am
by Cloud
Some cool photos in here, Here's afew of mine:

Image
My mate's old M3 at Ingram Valley.

Image
Another of his M3, this time on Longhorsely Moor.

Image
A total of 9 exposures makes up this HDR.

Image
No idea, i just liked it. Was shot and an abanddoned quary afew miles from here.

All shot on a Nikkon D40 15-55mm Nikkor Lens.

Posted: 10 Dec 2008 03:03 am
by sven360
Nice shots there sm49

Ahh..Northumberland.Ya gotta love it.

Least populated County in England and blatently the best.

Posted: 10 Dec 2008 10:30 am
by Chris_C
Top M3 and the landscape HDR look awesome Cloud.

I wonder why so many of us are into photography, something to do with the type of mindset that likes slightly strange cars?