Page 10 of 11
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 11 Aug 2009 11:49 pm
by filthyjohn
Yeah Dan that's pretty harsh luck. My rear lights have been playing me for a fool too, try lots of cleaning with something aggressive like isopropyl alcohol. Hope the retest works for RRG!
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 12 Aug 2009 09:47 pm
by 340GLT
Lovin the look of that in primer mate, good luck with the welding.
Adam
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 12:37 am
by Bazboy
Cheers guys, hopefully she will be ready for saturdays retest, most of the welding is done now so just lights handbrake and exhaust left.
Dan
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 01:10 am
by foggyjames
I've just got in from working on fitting cruise control to the 740 (ready for the long trip down to Zomerzet at the weekend!)...and in messing with the brake pedal switch (from where it derives +12v for its own switches for the brake and clutch pedals) the damn things don't switch off half the time, and adjustment appears to be...non-trivial. Bloody cars, eh?
cheers
James
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 08:41 am
by SteveP
foggyjames wrote:cruise control to the 740
Cruise control would suggest that the 740 is going to actually be driven

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 09:44 am
by volvosneverdie
Cruise control?
Because resting one of your feet on a pedal is like, way hard?
Has the world gone completley American now?

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 09:48 am
by Chris_C
Resting your foot on the pedal of Ryans 700 means you are likely doing 1, maybe 2 million mph
After driving the Scoob the last few days I now see why cruise is a necessity in silly power cars!
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 09:53 am
by volvosneverdie
Ah,
THAT 740.
I thought it was a generic, un-awsome-ised one.
I cannot even imagine that much powers.
Which is probably for the best.

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 08:48 pm
by Jason B
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that welding looks a little suspect.... only mentioning it because it's for an mot. I'm not a good welder but I would suggest that the welds aren't penetrating well if you had to grind lots off the top to get them to the stage in the picture. If I were you, I'd practice on some metal of similar thickness to setup the welder well, with the goal of smooth torch motion, as heat management is the main game with welding.
Like I say, I'm not very good with a welder myself though...
Other than that the car looks fantastic in primer!! - keep up the good work ethic

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 13 Aug 2009 10:55 pm
by Bazboy
Cheers for the kind words guys i praying it passes on saturday, got work till 2 tomo and then im straight onto the hand brake which is stiking and generally not working well.
Im not doing the welding myself my mate is who has done loads for me to get me through the last mot. I dunno much about welding myself just hope the mot man likes it, cheers for the advice tho Jason.
Im really tempted to leave it in primer and laquer her up

but well see.
Cheers Dan
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 14 Aug 2009 12:01 am
by volvosneverdie
^^^^ if you don't, i think that I might.

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 14 Aug 2009 12:20 am
by Speedy88
nuts, got my mot on monday. Minor sill welding needed but I don't know anyone who can so I'm going to have to bear the garage prices

Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 14 Aug 2009 12:24 am
by volvosneverdie
Speedy88 wrote:nuts, got my mot on monday. Minor sill welding needed but I don't know anyone who can so I'm going to have to bear the garage prices

Ayaz.
That's gonna sting.
Good luck man.
Hope it just needs a teeny weeny bit.
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 14 Aug 2009 01:52 am
by foggyjames
SteveP wrote:Cruise control would suggest that the 740 is going to actually be driven

If you actually got off your lazy girly-car brummie arse and came to a meet or two, you'd have seen plenty of it this year

Coming on Sunday, then?
Cruise is a beautiful thing for long motorway drives. It sounds lazy....until you have it. Then you wonder how you ever did without it.
The 740 isn't that bad on the motorway...you have to drop a couple of gears and weld your foot to the floor before starts attempting to rearrange your internal organs. It's not *that* quick...but I tried following Ryan (plus two passengers) in the 740, with me in his C70 T5. No way I was keeping up...! Trouble at the moment is with bad behaviour from it. We need to give it some TLC...like an overhaul of the MS installation, starting with a better box, and a connector which wasn't designed with a printer in mind...!
cheers
James
Re: 1986 340(the results are in)
Posted: 14 Aug 2009 08:35 am
by SteveP
I can see the benefits of cruise, I was in two minds with it when I had it on my T4... on one hand it saved ya right foot but on the other it was pretty weird when it wanted to accelerate slightly and it starts coming on boost when theres no need!