This somehow explains why traffic looks how it looks in ItalyIvanAE86 wrote:nr's 7 and 9 all the way as far as I'm concerned, those are some of the best quality v300 pics I've ever seen.. Cant get too excited about a view of the rear window myself though.. like the italian driver in the gumball rally movie said before breaking the rear view mirror off and chucking it away: First-a rule of italian driving: Whats-a behind you is-a not important!!
V3M Photo Comp Round 9 - Reflection - Vote Now!
- petefarrell360
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: 11 Oct 2004 07:12 pm
- Location: Bucks, UK
Errr....... well, good question MJ, any ideas? We can have a tie with a joint decision on the next topic, maybe combine two idea? Or we have another voting session with those two pictures, which I don't think is all that fair, as it's relying on someone else voting for one, maybe someone who didn't vote before, and requires everyone who voted before to vote again so that it starts off fair.
Any more ideas....... answers on the proverbial postcard, or a simple post here will do.
Pete
Any more ideas....... answers on the proverbial postcard, or a simple post here will do.
Pete
G reg 360 GLT, G reg 340 GL Variomatic, plus many more..........
Hmm, or the winner of the previous comp, which would be you Pete, could have the final casting vote.
A re-pole with just the tied 2 photos would be the fairest way, but that means another week or 2 of voting before a new comp is started.
Personally I thing tied winners should be left as that, tied winners. As for the decision on the next comp, it could either be a joint decision, or I like your idea of a combination. Say one person suggested reflections and the other suggested 300's In Motion, then you'd have to enter pictures containing 300's In Motion and reflections! An interesting combination.
I suggest that both winners send you their idea without discussing it with each other so the combination is revealed as a surprise
A re-pole with just the tied 2 photos would be the fairest way, but that means another week or 2 of voting before a new comp is started.
Personally I thing tied winners should be left as that, tied winners. As for the decision on the next comp, it could either be a joint decision, or I like your idea of a combination. Say one person suggested reflections and the other suggested 300's In Motion, then you'd have to enter pictures containing 300's In Motion and reflections! An interesting combination.
I suggest that both winners send you their idea without discussing it with each other so the combination is revealed as a surprise

My suggestion is, make up new subject and those that got tie, should submit new photos, then new voting for those new pics, that would show which one is true master of photography and would be fair to all.
It takes of course some time and is bit more work, but not too much, imo. Would be interesting also to see new pics and also I would think it would give some little extra excitement to competitors too
It takes of course some time and is bit more work, but not too much, imo. Would be interesting also to see new pics and also I would think it would give some little extra excitement to competitors too
I'm not convinced by that idea Jani I'm afraid.
I mean it'll take a fair bit of extra time when other people want to get on with the next round, and the new topic may be far easier or harder for one or other competitor, or one may not be able to enter the tie for one reason or other, and I think it makes it more complicated.
But I agree, yours would be a fairer way of choosing one winner
But I agree, yours would be a fairer way of choosing one winner

-
classicswede
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 5471
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005 06:52 pm
- Location: Anglesey North Wales
- Contact:
Some evry good pictures here. I'm impressed.
How about increasing the voting time or everyone to re vote but only with the two pictures.
I for one have missed the voting.
How about increasing the voting time or everyone to re vote but only with the two pictures.
I for one have missed the voting.
Dai
Please email me directly on dai@classicswede.co.uk
http://www.classicswede.com
phone/text 07824887160
Web shop http://www.classicswede.co.uk/

Please email me directly on dai@classicswede.co.uk
http://www.classicswede.com
phone/text 07824887160
Web shop http://www.classicswede.co.uk/

- trabitom99
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 4398
- Joined: 06 Jan 2007 02:38 pm
- Location: Bonn, Germany
... or just PM both winners & ask who's the most keen to host the next competition?
Otherwise a quick re-vote with only 2 pictures within a week or so sounds like a good idea ...
Tom
Otherwise a quick re-vote with only 2 pictures within a week or so sounds like a good idea ...
Tom
343 GL Touring B14.1E CVT (155) 98000kms 1980 (sold)
343 L Junior B14.3E MT4 (155) 229000kms 1981 (scrapped)
343 DLS B19A MT4 (155) 167900kms 1982
360 GL Injection B200F MT5 (231) 348598kms 1988 (scrapped)
360 GLT B200F MT5 (302) 230000kms 1988
343 L Junior B14.3E MT4 (155) 229000kms 1981 (scrapped)
343 DLS B19A MT4 (155) 167900kms 1982
360 GL Injection B200F MT5 (231) 348598kms 1988 (scrapped)
360 GLT B200F MT5 (302) 230000kms 1988
I'd love to see a tie tbh, seems a shame to have victory snatched from the other guy. Was a great competition, and having 2 winners is a reflection of the quality.
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
-
classicswede
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 5471
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005 06:52 pm
- Location: Anglesey North Wales
- Contact:
Chris_C wrote:reflection of the quality.
So if we have two winners I take it they are going to have to work together on the next round. If that is workable I see no reason why not.
Dai
Please email me directly on dai@classicswede.co.uk
http://www.classicswede.com
phone/text 07824887160
Web shop http://www.classicswede.co.uk/

Please email me directly on dai@classicswede.co.uk
http://www.classicswede.com
phone/text 07824887160
Web shop http://www.classicswede.co.uk/

- petefarrell360
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: 11 Oct 2004 07:12 pm
- Location: Bucks, UK
I've been thinking about this one. I'm going to consult both winners privately via PM, with the suggestion that it stays a tie, as really, they have both won, one person should not take victory from the other in this case.
Another vote IMO relies on all people who voted before voting the same way again and voting at all to get the tie, then basically anyone who didn't vote before and does vote decides it. So I'm not keen on that.
I think a joint subject is the best plan, so as you say, in the example of the previous two comps, motion and reflection as one. The only thing would be that it isn't too difficult or hard to compete in and get a picture. It has to be achieveable. But as long as it seems possible, I think we should go with that option. So as I say, PM's on way and if the two people involved send me their ideas I can see if it will work, then go from there!
Pete
Another vote IMO relies on all people who voted before voting the same way again and voting at all to get the tie, then basically anyone who didn't vote before and does vote decides it. So I'm not keen on that.
I think a joint subject is the best plan, so as you say, in the example of the previous two comps, motion and reflection as one. The only thing would be that it isn't too difficult or hard to compete in and get a picture. It has to be achieveable. But as long as it seems possible, I think we should go with that option. So as I say, PM's on way and if the two people involved send me their ideas I can see if it will work, then go from there!
Pete
G reg 360 GLT, G reg 340 GL Variomatic, plus many more..........
Right, now that Pete has made an official descision as to the winner(s), will there now be an announcement thread detailing who took what pic?
Terms and conditions apply. This post may go down as well as up. Regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Hard hats to be worn. No reversing without a banksman. No admittance to unauthorized persons. Stop that. Put that down. Leave that alone.
- petefarrell360
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: 11 Oct 2004 07:12 pm
- Location: Bucks, UK


