Page 2 of 3

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 12:16 am
by foggyjames
I meant the diff ratio is good for 165mph...not that it would do it from the factory :-P Ryan's 740 would do 150+ with ~230bhp, and with the current 275-odd, it goes off the top of the 140mph scale rather quickly! A 360 with 250-300 should be fine to do those kind of speeds...on power grounds, at least!

I had the pleasure of taking my car to Elvington a couple of years back. I have a nice (blurry) picture of the needle a fair way off the top of the scale.

Huskyracer's 340 1.7 Turbo will do ~150 when it hits the 7500rpm limiter with a 3.64 (1.7) diff. He said it was "interesting". I've now given him a 3.36:1 diff, as apparantly 150 isn't fast enough ;)

cheers

James

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 12:24 am
by kaos
hence me keeping my 4 speed box.. and 3.61.1 jobby diff:D


*cough*trying to get hold of an eton...*cough*

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 02:07 am
by foggyjames
The 5 speed is better in every other way I can think of...but the ratios *may* work out that the 4 speed has a higher top speed than the 5 speed. A 5 speed will get there quicker!

cheers

James

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 10:33 am
by SteveP
Hmm no idea why you'd wana keep a 4 speed box, it makes the 1.4 painfully slow whilst in 5speed guise its not bad :)

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 01:06 pm
by Jason B
isn't the 4 speed box just the 5 speed ratios without 4th gear.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 02:26 pm
by Chris_C
It's without 5th gear, and the diff is longer to give roughly the same speed, but with less accel.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 05:35 pm
by filthyjohn
Been thinking about this, I remember guess-culating you could get 170 out with the 3.36, and wondering how much power you'd need to do that given the 'aerodynamics' :lol:
Great to hear husky can hit 150 with (is it?) 210hp, that should mean 170 is within the realms of reality. :shock:
Still, my 60 was terrifying when I eventually got it off the clock, and I'd be really worried about lift at those speeds!

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 10:33 pm
by foggyjames
I don't have the data to hand, but I'm pretty sure the ratios are a little different between an M45 and M47. Only a little, mind...

cheers

James

Posted: 22 Apr 2008 10:52 pm
by kaos
i had the data availble to me..

but i dont untill i go pick up some more b172 parts..

still which one of you that has posted a million times want my lovely B14.4E :P

Posted: 23 Apr 2008 01:19 pm
by classicswede
I've had an indicated 120 MPH from a 1.4 I think 4 speed. But in real terms that is only about 105 - 110. I dare say on a long down hill you could possible get a little more

Posted: 24 Apr 2008 06:29 am
by filthyjohn
I think the speedo's pretty accurate. 99 indicated on mine is 100 on the tomtom :shock:

Posted: 24 Apr 2008 09:39 am
by Chris_C
The speedo's vary loads, Fake is about 10% over according to my GPS, Andy's red car is only around 3% out to the same GPS.

Posted: 24 Apr 2008 06:18 pm
by foggyjames
I'd say it's more likely to be related to tyre size than the speedos themselves...although they won't be perfectly consistant.

cheers

James

Posted: 24 Apr 2008 07:08 pm
by kaos
i am running sexy 13"s

:D

Posted: 24 Apr 2008 07:38 pm
by foggyjames
...but what size tyres ;)

cheers

James