Page 11 of 44
Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 01:18 am
by jtbo
I decide to take pic of my car with stars, but strange light appears to photo:

Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 01:27 am
by jtbo
Sun already?
Closer inspection reveals that it is not sun after all:
This is where battery finally gets flat, it was fully charged when I left

Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 10:30 am
by Chris_C
jtbo wrote:Sun already?
Awesome
Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 10:32 am
by volvosneverdie
I'll see your Awsome chris,
And I'll raise you an Absolutely.
Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 01:12 pm
by SteveP
Jani, your pics are awesome lately!

Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 01:25 pm
by WooDooUK
Great Pics there,
What lense did you use to take the picture of the moon?
Re: Photos
Posted: 16 Jan 2009 02:16 pm
by jtbo
Thanks guys, your comments mean a lot
Close up from moon is taken with Tamron 70-300mm lens, I'm not happy to sharpness of that shot, but I guess it was because of there was so much dirty air as moon was so low.
It can do far better than that:
Those photos I posted are pretty much out from camera, all have resized, first and fourth have been rotated (it is amzingly hard to get them straight in dark when you don't really see a lot from finder), fifth has edited most as it is built up from 5 images so it has total exposure time of 2 minutes 30 seconds, seventh has had it's levels adjusted a bit, some sky filter would been nice for that shot, surpsisingly last pic was only resized
Close up from moon was around 1/60th of second exposure time ISO 200 and F might have been 8, that is out from memory, so could be wrong too. Other shots are 20-30 seconds ISO 1600 and F3.5 mostly for wide angles and 5.6-6.5 for narrower angles.
So to take pic from moon one could perhaps getaway without tripod, even 300mm requires quite fast shutter speed it migh be possible if using large aperture, but that of course limits quality a bit.
BTW has anyone ever dismantled Nikkor 18-55 DX II lens? I have one with gears broken, so I thought that I remove autofocus from it as it should work manually just fine and I don't use autfocus anyway. I could get it open, but there is two metal rings that somehow hold backplate on place so I really can't get gears out from it.
Those wide angle shots were taken with Nikkor 18-55mm AF which is lesser in image quality than that type II
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 12:40 am
by Chris_C
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 01:09 am
by filthyjohn
Hey nice snaps Mr C.
All taken in the New Forest?
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 01:12 am
by volvosneverdie
Looks like youve been out on a nice stag weekend there chris. Hope it wasnt too deer.
On a serious not though, good shootin man.
Awesome wildlifery.
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 10:51 am
by Chris_C
filthyjohn wrote:All taken in the New Forest?
Spot on dude, I got super lucky, there was a herd(sp?)/flock/lot of them
Also got round to uploading a couple from that Duxford trip I mentioned months ago... shame the sky was quite so poor, twas raining most of the day so my 300mm wasn't happy.

Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 11:37 am
by volvosneverdie
Chris_C wrote:
Also got round to uploading a couple from that Duxford trip I mentioned months ago... shame the sky was quite so poor, twas raining most of the day so my 300mm wasn't happy.

Hurricane and a thunderbolt?
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 12:13 pm
by redline
volvosneverdie wrote:

Hurricane and a thunderbolt?[/quote]
thank feck you never joined the Raf
its a North American P-51 mustang and a supermarine spitfire in the top one
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 12:18 pm
by volvosneverdie
Re: Photos
Posted: 19 Jan 2009 05:37 pm
by redline
oh and the other one is a dehavilland chipmunk trainer so

to you