Page 1 of 1
340 and fuel
Posted: 28 Apr 2004 11:39 am
by 340
I drive a Volvo 340 (petrol engine). When four star disappeared I moved over to Lead Replacement Petrol with no problems. But now that seems to be being phased out.
Does anyone have any experience with additives, or any other suggestions for what to use in the 340?
I'm wary of using Redex after using it in another car (not a Volvo) many years ago.
- thanks
Posted: 28 Apr 2004 02:41 pm
by 5lab
how old is it? i've been running my '86 1.4 on normal unleaded no problem..
Posted: 28 Apr 2004 03:34 pm
by 340
It's 88. When you say you've been running on unleaded, what octane rating?
Posted: 28 Apr 2004 04:14 pm
by Janitor
most people use a "fuel cat"-this converts unleaded back to 4star !!
they go inline with your pipe/hose!!
http://www.fuelcat.co.uk/mainpage.html
Posted: 28 Apr 2004 04:16 pm
by Janitor
ps they are small-not a massive big thing-the only thing i can think of a similar size is a smartie tube !!

Posted: 29 Apr 2004 09:37 am
by 5lab
i use normal stuff, the cheapest at every pump. i dunno what that is in this country but im sure an 88 will be fine if mine was. somehting like 96 i would think
Posted: 29 Apr 2004 07:26 pm
by 360GL
All 300 series petrol engines without catalytic converter from including 1987 model year onward can use either leaded or unleaded fuel. The octane rating requirements are:
B14.4E, B172K, B200K: min. 96 RON leaded, min. 95 RON unleaded
B14.4E-D, B172K-D: min. 95 RON unleaded only
B200E without cat. converter: min. 92 RON leaded, min. 91 RON unleaded
B200E with cat. converter, B200F: min. 91 RON unleaded only
Early models must use leaded fuel (or lead supplement additive):
B14 models: min. 96 RON
B172, B19A, B19E, B200K, B200E models: min. 98 RON
source: Haynes Manual, User Manual
So you can run on unleaded without worries. If you have catalytic converter, you actually must use unleaded fuel.
Posted: 30 Apr 2004 12:58 pm
by 5lab
my '86 runs fine with unleaded/no additives anyways. used to put 4 star in before i bumped into the owner who told me i didnt need to - and i've not noticed any differences in running since. the engines WELL worn in anyhows, i dont think im gonna get more than another 25-30k out of her so im not to worried
Hugh
Posted: 31 May 2004 11:33 pm
by 340
Thanks everyone for the advice. It's been useful.
Sorry for the delay in returning to reply.