Page 1 of 2

D16 engine info

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 07:52 pm
by shimon340
Hello,

Im interested in building a UK D16 340. This was was never imported to the UK as the steering column collides with the diesel injection pump for right hand drive models. However, there are RHD Irish 340 diesels as the Irish dealerships installed modified engine mounts to move rotate the engine so the steering column wasnt a problem

Does anyone know what other Renaults had the 1.6 diesel?

or maybe I should consider a 340 1.9 diesel or a 440 diesel instead......

thanks guys

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 08:02 pm
by 5lab
i'd get an engine out of a 440 instead. the 1.6 derv is VERY slow, and not particularly good - the 1.9 tdi would be nice and nippy in comparison

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 08:05 pm
by Duvel78
5lab wrote:the 1.6 derv is VERY slow, and not particularly good
How do you know that? You've never seen a D16! sm52

Slow OK, but it's a good engine, very strong...

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 08:57 pm
by petefarrell360
Well, now I may have just the thing for you here mate! LOL, I have a 360 GLT diesel! It's got a Nissan 2.0 Turbo lump in it. I bought it as a project, but other things have taken priority, space is limited, so it looks like it must go. All the hard work has been done, a better body donor would be the best plan, as it's basically in a shell at the moment.
Image
If not, I'd suggest the 1.9 td from a 400, excellent engine, it'd easily compare to the 360 B200E 2.0 petrol lump in performance, and that's in the 400 shell. Lots of torque. The chap who runs the Friends of the Volvo 300 has both I believe, a D16 from Ireland and a 1.9 td lump in a 300. Might be worth a chat. Let me know if you require details.
Pete

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 09:01 pm
by antiekeradio
1.6 diesel is so crappy on performance, that all the rest doesn't matter.


it was used in the renault express mainly.


the 1.9 diesel looks the same from the outside. performance will be comparable to a fast 1.4 petrol engine, better on low revs.

gr. Wouter

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 09:06 pm
by SteveP
I reckon a 1.9TD would give far better performance to a 1.4, more like GLT speed - particularly mid range! A definite good idea for a conversion!

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 09:37 pm
by antiekeradio
wasn't talking about that, was I?

could be that a 1.9 TD compares to a faster version. will certainly not look like a 1.6D ..

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 09:41 pm
by SteveP
antiekeradio wrote:wasn't talking about that, was I?
No.. I'm blind... :oops:

Posted: 30 Oct 2005 10:19 pm
by antiekeradio
ok, sorry about the grumpy reply..

(just recieved a email from friends, who had an accident with their daf -definately not their fault but repair/insurance etc still uncertain- )

do you have to pay a 'diesel premium' in the UK, when you convert a petrol car to diesel?


for such a converion, ideally, I would prefer a Volkswagen 1.9 TDI to any other diesel version. However, that would bring its own issues, especially because the advanced computer control and immobiliser designs...

Gr. Wouter

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 11:26 am
by Japper
I'd suggest a V10 Tdi. For towing mountains onto caravans

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 11:38 am
by 340GLT
Japper wrote:I'd suggest a V10 Tdi. For towing mountains onto caravans
Your not Kidding!!!!!
Cheers Adam

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 11:54 am
by Fuse
petefarrell360 wrote:Well, now I may have just the thing for you here mate! LOL, I have a 360 GLT diesel! It's got a Nissan 2.0 Turbo lump in it. I bought it as a project, but other things have taken priority, space is limited, so it looks like it must go. All the hard work has been done, a better body donor would be the best plan, as it's basically in a shell at the moment.
Image
If not, I'd suggest the 1.9 td from a 400, excellent engine, it'd easily compare to the 360 B200E 2.0 petrol lump in performance, and that's in the 400 shell. Lots of torque. The chap who runs the Friends of the Volvo 300 has both I believe, a D16 from Ireland and a 1.9 td lump in a 300. Might be worth a chat. Let me know if you require details.
Pete
Hey, we need some engine pics! :D It would be nice if you have some pics of engine bay.

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 12:12 pm
by shimon340
hi guys

Thanks for the excellent response and info!!

I'll look into the 1.9 route then....

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 12:20 pm
by V6 Man
petefarrell360 wrote: so it looks like it must go.
I still say keep the engine and associated bits for the 360 pick-up project.

Posted: 31 Oct 2005 02:18 pm
by petefarrell360
I've been meaning to get some pictures of under the bonnet. Well, we'll see, too many projects, not enough time, or more importantly space. We'll see what we can do.
Pete