GLS vs. GLT
GLS vs. GLT
I currently have the option of a 360 GLS or GLT. Both 1984, both 5dr. I think both are in pretty good nick - I don't know as much about the GLT but from how it's been described it seems like it should be ok.
Does the extra 23hp and 10Nm/rps in the B19E make a noticeable difference in the performance and is the jetronic ignition likely to be more or less reliable than the carb on the B19A? Are there any other differences in brakes/suspension or is it pretty much a matter of trim and alloys?
[edit] The GLT is now looking to be £170 more to insure and that's fully comp when my GLS quote was TPFT (£310 vs. £140). I can get the GLT down to £260 TPFT.
Does the extra 23hp and 10Nm/rps in the B19E make a noticeable difference in the performance and is the jetronic ignition likely to be more or less reliable than the carb on the B19A? Are there any other differences in brakes/suspension or is it pretty much a matter of trim and alloys?
[edit] The GLT is now looking to be £170 more to insure and that's fully comp when my GLS quote was TPFT (£310 vs. £140). I can get the GLT down to £260 TPFT.
Last edited by ebdl on 22 Mar 2006 06:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Depends on colour 
I've heard the early GLT's are pretty damn quick being high compression, but the GLS is hardly slow. It's not really an extra 23bhp though is it?! I think the gap is far closer than that.
I'd go for the GLS with the GLT alloys
Awkward bugger eh...
I've heard the early GLT's are pretty damn quick being high compression, but the GLS is hardly slow. It's not really an extra 23bhp though is it?! I think the gap is far closer than that.
I'd go for the GLS with the GLT alloys
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
According to my brochure for the 1983 300 series, max output is 92hp/5400rpm for the B19A and 115hp/6000rpm for the B19E. The GLS is the metallic maroon colour and the GLT is blue (I presume dark metallic, but was there a lighter shade?).
I'm hoping to get some track action with this car, which is why I think the GLT might be the better option if it really does have a power or handling advantage - or maybe it's easier to tune?
I'm hoping to get some track action with this car, which is why I think the GLT might be the better option if it really does have a power or handling advantage - or maybe it's easier to tune?
The GLT does have different suspension - but I'm not convinced it's that significant. The injection isn't any easier to tune, because to tune it you need to junk the injection system anyway...
The light metallic blue is nice on a Mk2 GLT... but maroon metallic is my favourite colour on the GLS!
Light metallic blue here: (2nd row down)
http://www.volvo300mania.com/brochures7.htm
The light metallic blue is nice on a Mk2 GLT... but maroon metallic is my favourite colour on the GLS!
Light metallic blue here: (2nd row down)
http://www.volvo300mania.com/brochures7.htm
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
- foggyjames
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9361
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
It depends on your intentions. Will you keep them stock? If so, get the GLT. If you're planning simple modifications (e.g. bolt on a set of big carbs), get the GLS. If you're planning extensive modifications (i.e. stuff that needs aftermarket EMS to support it), get the GLT.
cheers
James
cheers
James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
If the GLT's any good I reckon I'll go for that because I'm unlikely to do much modification to the power-train. I'm most likely to sort out the suspension and brakes (if necessary?) and get some decent tyres.
Of course I could get both...
[note to self: this is meant to be a cost-effective money-saving enterprise]
Of course I could get both...
- Andy's-Old-Beast
- Posts: 144
- Joined: 06 Dec 2005 08:39 pm
- Location: Vancouver, Canada


