GLS vs. GLT

A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby...
NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
User avatar
ebdl
Posts: 324
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 09:19 pm
Location: Exeter/Birmingham

GLS vs. GLT

Post by ebdl »

I currently have the option of a 360 GLS or GLT. Both 1984, both 5dr. I think both are in pretty good nick - I don't know as much about the GLT but from how it's been described it seems like it should be ok.

Does the extra 23hp and 10Nm/rps in the B19E make a noticeable difference in the performance and is the jetronic ignition likely to be more or less reliable than the carb on the B19A? Are there any other differences in brakes/suspension or is it pretty much a matter of trim and alloys?

[edit] The GLT is now looking to be £170 more to insure and that's fully comp when my GLS quote was TPFT (£310 vs. £140). I can get the GLT down to £260 TPFT.
Last edited by ebdl on 22 Mar 2006 06:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

Depends on colour ;)

I've heard the early GLT's are pretty damn quick being high compression, but the GLS is hardly slow. It's not really an extra 23bhp though is it?! I think the gap is far closer than that.

I'd go for the GLS with the GLT alloys ;) Awkward bugger eh...
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
SoLaMaNdA
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 560
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 05:17 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by SoLaMaNdA »

SteveP wrote: I'd go for the GLS with the GLT alloys ;) Awkward bugger eh...
Agreed! :wink:

The GLS has plenty poke and same brakes. Some 14" alloys improves the handling quite alot.
User avatar
ebdl
Posts: 324
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 09:19 pm
Location: Exeter/Birmingham

Post by ebdl »

According to my brochure for the 1983 300 series, max output is 92hp/5400rpm for the B19A and 115hp/6000rpm for the B19E. The GLS is the metallic maroon colour and the GLT is blue (I presume dark metallic, but was there a lighter shade?).

I'm hoping to get some track action with this car, which is why I think the GLT might be the better option if it really does have a power or handling advantage - or maybe it's easier to tune?
User avatar
SoLaMaNdA
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 560
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 05:17 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by SoLaMaNdA »

I had a newer engined gls (101bhp) but this B19 engined car seems alot more pokey. Must have a flatter torque curve.
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

The GLT does have different suspension - but I'm not convinced it's that significant. The injection isn't any easier to tune, because to tune it you need to junk the injection system anyway...

The light metallic blue is nice on a Mk2 GLT... but maroon metallic is my favourite colour on the GLS!

Light metallic blue here: (2nd row down)

http://www.volvo300mania.com/brochures7.htm
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Post by jtbo »

I would choose GLT and then to install Megasquirt, would be much easier than for GLS :D Almost plug and play :lol:
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

The man has a point actually... I'd forgot about the fuel system differences
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Post by jtbo »

Oh yes, even if not going to install megasquirt, still injection is far more nicer to drive and start in cold than carb version.

Differential is shorter ration in GLT too, so it runs higher revs, maybe bit more thirsty, little things.
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage
User avatar
foggyjames
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9361
Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by foggyjames »

It depends on your intentions. Will you keep them stock? If so, get the GLT. If you're planning simple modifications (e.g. bolt on a set of big carbs), get the GLS. If you're planning extensive modifications (i.e. stuff that needs aftermarket EMS to support it), get the GLT.

cheers

James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
pettaw
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 1673
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 07:39 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by pettaw »

Stock injection on a 360 is shocking in cold weather for first 30 seconds. Completely over rich which is why many many 360 injections suffer performance-wise. They get coked up by their injections throwing gallons of fuel into them.
User avatar
ebdl
Posts: 324
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 09:19 pm
Location: Exeter/Birmingham

Post by ebdl »

If the GLT's any good I reckon I'll go for that because I'm unlikely to do much modification to the power-train. I'm most likely to sort out the suspension and brakes (if necessary?) and get some decent tyres.

Of course I could get both... :roll: [note to self: this is meant to be a cost-effective money-saving enterprise]
User avatar
Andy's-Old-Beast
Posts: 144
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 08:39 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Andy's-Old-Beast »

ebdl wrote:
Of course I could get both... :roll:
Yeah... you know you want to! Do it! :)
Previous owner of The Beast!
Now a 1969 Dodge Monaco 5.2 V8 :D
User avatar
ebdl
Posts: 324
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 09:19 pm
Location: Exeter/Birmingham

Post by ebdl »

The GLT sold already :cry: If only I wasn't so busy and everywhere wasn't so far away :x Oh well, I guess it's going to have to be the GLS then.

I am coveting that grey GLT that's reappeared on eBay but I don't think that's going to happen... we'll see.
User avatar
Ali
Posts: 891
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 09:01 pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Post by Ali »

Looks like you've got no choice but to go for the GLS and get a set of twin carbs then :twisted:
Down to one car shocker! 1994 200sx S14 119k
Post Reply