A global place for general discussion (Volvo, V3M or non-Volvo related topics).
Please introduce yourself here, your Volvo 300 hobby... NO technical support, parts requests or car advertisements here
You photo guys, tell me your opinion if I should start to worry about. Sometimes when I take photo results are not quite what I have learned to except, I don't mean this shaked photo, but that there are some extra bright dots in pic.
Do I need to start saving to new camera already? D90 would be nice, but that is lot of money and I need to save for house repairs so I'm not too keen to spend at the moment, but then again I don't like to find out that all of sudden my pics are filled with akne...
jtbo wrote:I have it off as that is required for astro shooting
Why? This surprises me, DSLR's are known for noise.... ah, do stars appear to small and get confused for hot pixels and therefore get nuked?
The fact that that blue bar stays there I can't get my head round yet... it *looks* like a row lost due to a dodgy contact on an LCD screen which isn't a good thing but I know nothing about CCD's. Worth an ask on some astrophotog forums?
jtbo wrote:I have it off as that is required for astro shooting
Why? This surprises me, DSLR's are known for noise.... ah, do stars appear to small and get confused for hot pixels and therefore get nuked?
The fact that that blue bar stays there I can't get my head round yet... it *looks* like a row lost due to a dodgy contact on an LCD screen which isn't a good thing but I know nothing about CCD's. Worth an ask on some astrophotog forums?
Astro photos enter to software process which has much more advanced dark frame substraction than camera has so that is main reason. Typically in astrophotography you take several photos, also ton of dark frames and process them all together in special software like Registax 5 or Deep Space Stacker.
Only reason I'm worried is that there has been more and more of them and also some dead pixels on daytime photos where I have not seen them before.