Tell me about the DF4 clio anyone?


My 1.4 is about as economical as pouring money into a hole by the side of the road and im really highly amused by the thought of a 1.2 16valve.

Its technicly a Valver..............................................................................
And surely more economical on petril, tax, etc.
Though I think theyre later blocks??

Anyone know if the gearbox fit is correct?
Or anything else for that matter?

Let the knowledge banks open!

Look at a C-type(or F ofcourse)...DF4 sounds unknown, and very deferent.

pistonpen paultje wrote:Look at a C-type(or F ofcourse)...DF4 sounds unknown, and very deferent.

thought so.

If you wanna go old skool, drop a gordini head onto the 1.4 bottom end.
Adam

340GLT wrote:If you wanna go old skool, drop a gordini head onto the 1.4 bottom end.
Adam

Wah?

Gordini head from what dude?

*edit Renner5?

Just valver it, mine used less fuel than the B14 around the doors, and that's with hosepipe-tastic carb jets!

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeveryone valvers it man!

Totally tempted, but fancy something diferent too.

1.4s a bad starting point for owt else though.
it seems.

fug it.
Valver it is then.

Lets commision some Valver3M t shirts.

Or stickers anyway.

1.8 8v from an RSi?
2.0 8v from a 400?
They're all just as much work as a 16v really, so you might as well just give in and accept that we'll all have 16v power eventually.

filthyjohn wrote:1.8 8v from an RSi?
2.0 8v from a 400?
They're all just as much work as a 16v really, so you might as well just give in and accept that we'll all have 16v power eventually.

1.8 8v sounds intresting man.

Wondered what was in RSis.

Think you might be right though.
Unless something else comes up trebble cheap, a valver it shall be.

Hands off the Barnsley one!

filthyjohn wrote:Hands off the Barnsley one!

Double skint man.
And in no real hurry anyway.
So after you sir.

Might not have been such a good idea calling it out though man.
Probly just increased interest in it 12fold.

Good point. Everyone forget I said owt about any Yorkshire-based engine type things.

1.2 16v is a nice little engine, i had 1 used daily with its 75hpowerzors and 50mpg

germ wrote:1.2 16v is a nice little engine, i had 1 used daily with its 75hpowerzors and 50mpg

aaaargh Will!

now i really want one!

bad Will!
thats a very bad Will!

errrm in an understeery way? or over?